[Replying to 'would you object to a celibate homosexual minister?']Absolutely I would! He would get a one way Greyhound bus ticket to the middle of nowhere!
9 comments
You do realize that celibate means not having sex, including of the homosexual variety? So, in other words, even a "non-practising" gay should be cast out to the middle of nowhere.
Not that it would be any of your business if he shagged his boyfriend like a bunny rabbit three times a day, but still.
So then you freely admit that it's not the act you object to, then, but the person. So much for hate the sin, love the sinner.
In the poster's defense, having gay sex isn't the sin alone.. It's even being attracted to the same sex.. Being gay at all.
I don't agree with this and it's certainly not word for word in the bible but I believe most fundies like this one would agree.
Yet they continuously like to spew that homosexuality has nothing to do with the person, and is just the 'behavior' or the 'act'. Using their own arguments, someone who is homosexual but completely celibate isn't actually homosexual, since it's the act itself that makes you that way.By saying they would reject even a celibate homosexual points out their hypocrisy and the fact that no, it IS actually the person and NOT the act they find so objectionable.
This response merely catches their self-righteous lie and exposes them for the true bigots they really are.
Also, this just in :rush in tickets to nowhere overtax system, still falling short after adding buses. Experts say, "think how bad it would be if most them weren't in nowhere anyway"
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.