This is a gem of fuckup from the same thread:
"Besides, not punishing women [for adultery] implies they lack the power of personal choice, which any female who hasn't been caught doing something wrong will insist isn't true."
What. The. Fuck? Its ok to punish women far more severely than the man because they make their own choices about who they sleep with? In other words, men can fuck with impunity and not be punished, but women should be punished because not punishing them implies that they cannot make decisions?
o_O
What kind of mental gymnastics do you have to do to reach that conclusion and find nothing wrong with it?
If a five-yo girl is caught with chocolate smeared all over her face and her hand in an empty jar of cookies, it is possible she will lie and say she didn't do it - this is because she is a child. If an adult woman is caught doing something wrong she isn't going to say: "Oh! Woe unto me! I am but a poor little woman who cannot make her own decisions!" Like most adults, she will try to reason and apologise.
This guy is suggesting that women must be responsible for their personal choices so that they can be punished without remorse, but at the same time he puts their intelligence on a par with a child by suggesting women constantly lie about their ability to make personal choices simply because they have not "been caught" - as if all women are secretly doing something wrong all the time.
The whole thread is just one big bucket of pure FAIL. It is so easy for masculist movements to degenerate into chaos, when the haters cloud out the reasonable, and then they wonder why nobody takes them seriously.