bobx23456 #sexist

bobx23456 #sexist mens-rights.net

*talking about women being stoned in the middle east for sex outside of marriage, which the other mens' rights activists were against*

What the hey. It was only a female. She violated traditional law. Men are in control in that community. She violated men's control and learned the hard way.

On several other topics you seem to have the program of men's rights. But then I find this and you are about to sack men for following historic assertion of male control. Which side are you on? The men's side, or the fmeinist side? Now I'm confused

62 comments

old comment by Septic Sceptic

When I saw "It was only a female", I thought "Far too extreme- troll for certain." But looking through Bob's posting history I have to say that either he's a damn dedicated one, or the most psychotic piece of shit i've ever encountered. A few recurring themes in his posts:

- Sadism, a worrying number of posts to do with murdering women.
- Obsessive hatred for the police and judges, particularly with regards to divorce cases.
- Numerous mentions of justifying sex with 14 year old girls.
- And a few traces of homophobia and anti semitism.

From this i'm guessing that Bob has a real chip on his shoulder regarding an ex-wife, has an overall terror of women which he circumvents by focusing his attentions on underage girls, and also has a police history. All in all, a pillar of society.

old comment by SweetViolet

@Quantum Mechanic: "Fortunately he won't reproduce. "

I suspect he already has, and by a woman who eventually woke up to his true nature and grabbed the kid(s) and skedaddled, leading him into the court system. I can see him finding her with a new boyfriend (even after their relationship is terminated) and perceiving it as adultery.

I would not be surprised if he has been abusive to her and/or stalked her and had run-ins with the police as a result, has refused to pay his spousal/child support, perhaps even has been refused visitation with his kids due to his hostile and volatile nature.

This kind of misogyny (totally dehumanizing and objectifying women and seriously advocating death as a penalty for adultery) is really dangerous. Women die at the hands of men like this. And being able to find support for their control-freak sickness in repressive religions only exacerbates the problem.

I know the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, but is this kind of thing what it means?

old comment by Princess Rot

This asshole could keep FSTDT in quotes for months. He's a dyed-in-the-wool misogynist and a first class idiot. I feel sorry for his mother. I'll bet she was unclean for MONTHS after birthing this fucked up piece of human excrement.

Take this gem for instance:

"A father who encourages his daughter to “stay in school,” go to college, get a job, etc., is pushing his daughter into whoring and a whore's life. A good father encourages his daughter to become a good wife and mother, not a whore.

The good wife life plan begins when she passes through puberty and becomes a biologically adult woman. Usually that is about age 13 or 14, and has been that age for thousands of generations of women."

Oh dear god. I threw up a little when I read that. Sweeping gender stereotypes, insulting sensible men, supporting bad parenting, bile, bullshit, rampant misogyny, advocation of pedophilia, asstatistics (I don't want to know what he would do with the girls who start menstruating at 11 and 12). Vile.

@SweetViolet: I fear your projections may well be true. You can add violent pedophile to the mix as well.

old comment by

Bob has another buddy, dmc, who is as mysoginistic as him. And the way the news has been presented is misleading and very dishonest on his part, again. The case is that he is presenting that as "feminist are hypocrites who don't care about real violation of women's rights". Well, I have read the story and I have seen that the father took justice on his hand and has been arrested. He will be judged as a criminal and THANKS TO THE PRESSION OF FEMINISTS IN IRAN, he will be condemned, lightly surely, but condemned. And bear in mind that feminists in all sides of the planet have critisised it thousand times, it's nothing new. The question is, what do you expect?. Iran is a sovereign country and, if they don't change the law, what can they do?. Most probably they're not aware of their critiques, not for lack of interest, but because Iran has no diplomatic ties with United States and very limited ones with Europe. Besides, most probably they don't speak English and have a profound contempt for the Western World.
If the guy who stoned his daughter didn't care about the current law in Iran, who forbids this type of Kangaroo trial, why is he going to pay attention to a group of infidel women whose existence is not probably aware of because of his way of life?. And the same can apply to Iran's government.
And nevertheless, your administer uses it as a case against feminism. A lot of demagogy, don't you think?

bobx23456 #sexist mens-rights.net

62 comments

Confused?