1 2
#440687
Sweet Violet
Can you prove that without using biblically-derived sources?
Evolution is scientific theory, nothing more. There is no dogma, no worship, no diety. Prove to me that there are.
Telling lies like this is not a very good way to gain entrance to those Pearly Gates, you know. You may think lying to get people to believe in your god is a good thing, but your god, through Moses, has said differently.
3/22/2008 7:03:25 AM
#440695
TB
Moses was same as Hitler. End of discussion.
3/22/2008 7:17:05 AM
#440723
toothache
No. Your pastor lied to you.
3/22/2008 8:45:32 AM
#440729
Viva
The please mention those facts.
3/22/2008 9:02:26 AM
#440731
Return of Rob
?ytilaeR
3/22/2008 9:03:48 AM
#440735
DevNull
I think you mean:
Creationism is a religious fundamentalist cult with no fact. Evolution is based on facts of history.
3/22/2008 9:16:38 AM
#440736
funky fresh salad
I saw the Nightline story about this. One of the tour guides said that dating fossils based on which layer of rocks they are found in is "circular reasoning". It was hilariously ironic and incorrect.
They're not dating the fossil based on the layer and the layer based on the fossil! The deeper down, the older it is. It's that simple.
3/22/2008 9:18:20 AM
#440737
Red Cat
Ah yes, the 'evolution is a religion' argument. Some people really can't concieve that other people's lives can simply have an absence of religion.
This frightens them so much that even a false religion is better than none.
3/22/2008 9:19:07 AM
#440747
Nowonmai
You must have been a breech birth, because what you said was ass backward.
3/22/2008 10:00:04 AM
#440749
aaa
?treveR
3/22/2008 10:01:52 AM
#440754
ArgleBargle
Oh look, it's Bizzaro Day in Fundieland again.
3/22/2008 10:33:47 AM
#440761
Mog
How...? I...I honestly don't understand...?
3/22/2008 10:48:20 AM
#440769
This guy should write "strawmen for dummies"
3/22/2008 11:07:05 AM
#440795
Someone
By the way, to make it more correct, he ISN'T lying. (Whoa, SURPRISE) He's just wrong. Which one is worse exactly?
3/22/2008 12:09:18 PM
#440796
Ambrielle
Oh look, it's Opposite Day!
3/22/2008 12:09:43 PM
#440804
Nirjuana
Shiny mirror-award, anyone?
3/22/2008 12:17:38 PM
#440812
Someone
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_revisionism_%28negationism%29
Get it?
3/22/2008 12:24:47 PM
#440842
Mister Spak
Lord of the rings is based on the facts of history. I read thim in a book. These events were witnessed by eyewitnesses, one of whom wrote the book I read.
3/22/2008 1:14:27 PM
#440855
tmr
This is so freaking twisted it is incomprehensible. Was there any conscious thought in this statement at all? Any?
3/22/2008 1:37:35 PM
#440863
Freboy
History is defined as written records. The time before the written word we call pre-history.
The no-brainer here is: The birth of the universe is a matter of pre-history!
3/22/2008 1:43:19 PM
#440864
jsonitsac
I just read this article and I have a strange sense that these people are involved with Hovind based on the stuff they're promoting.
3/22/2008 1:43:20 PM
#440867
Grand Archblasphemer of York
Mirror, mirror.
I'm sorry...I just can't stop laughing!
3/22/2008 1:44:33 PM
#440895
What do you say to a person who was socially promoted in his home school? Everyone walking around with this person should be forced to wear an "I'm with stupid" T-shirt by law.
3/22/2008 2:28:39 PM
#440941
Illuminatalie
It are facts. I know because of my great learnings. Etc.
3/22/2008 3:23:06 PM
#440949
Archaeopath
ctrl..alt...delete...DELETE...DELETE!!!11one!
3/22/2008 3:44:27 PM
1 2