Don't follow the herd.
Be Jesus's little lovable sheeps.
Be a jesussheep instead of a evolutionsheep.
4/2/2008 9:24:12 PM
The christians don't want to admit to it, I encourage all of you to question christianity and not herd along with it like 'everyone else' it has flaws, check them out.
4/5/2008 5:43:18 AM
By all means, ask questions. We only ask that you listen to the answers.
Hey, we can dream can't we?
12/4/2008 4:25:28 PM
Of course it has flaws. So does the theory of gravity. They're just nowhere near enough to overturn the evidence.
7/12/2010 10:25:16 AM
Don't worry, there are thousands upon thousands of scientists checking every flaw in the Theory of Evolution. Every biology scientist wants to find a new facet of Evolution, to be the one who updates it. None of them are interested in status quo for the sake of status quo.
What won't the "evolutionists" admit to? If you're open-minded, you question EVERYTHING, including evolution.
7/12/2010 10:32:19 AM
Of course I questioned the theory of evolution. I'm sure many of us did. But it held up to our questioning, and that is why we believe it is correct.
You, on the other hand, are nothing but a member of a herd of sheeple.
3/10/2011 4:15:55 PM
All hail the God of the Gaps.
3/10/2011 4:37:37 PM
Whereas there is no flaw in the idea of a talking snake or a woman being made out of a man's rib or any of that crap.
Nooooooooo. None at all.
3/11/2011 12:47:10 AM
Yes, our current theory of biological evolution surely has some flaws.
In contrast to "intelligent design", which is just plain and hopelessly wrong.
This means that on the one hand there is still enough work to do for scientists, and on the other hand that creationism and "intelligent design" should go where it belongs: Into the dustbin.
3/11/2011 2:28:29 AM
Many of us have checked out the "flaws", many of the Flaws are unknowns or theoretical disagreements all exposed by the scientists themselves. That evolution, change over time, has happened is fact, not opinion, and no one actively in the arenas of evolution will deny it.
When Ganthore suggests you check out the flaws he immediately has ruled out the "evolutionists" (read : all educated, qualified scientists ) as liars. In other words he (like many) suggest only people who don't understand evolution or think religion trumps it (Ham, Hovind, Comfort, Robertson and that ilk) are to be trusted. That's the people they will send you to to check out the flaws.
3/11/2011 7:06:03 AM
"The evolutionists don't want to admit to it, I encourage all of you to question evolution and not herd along with it like 'everyone else' it has flaws, check them out."
Evolution was questioned till the cows came home in Kitzmiller vs. Dover. Yet, Judge John E. Jones III - a Conservative Christian - found for the plaintiffs. Why? The defendant's case had flaws. Check this out:
And you wonder why Michael Behe's 'evidence' and testimont was made a laughingstock by Judge Jones?
Kitzmiller vs. Dover was the final nail in the coffin of the Creation vs. Evolution debate - and the former was found wanting. And via this case, ergo Evolution is fact. 'Intelligent Design' - and therefore, by definition Creationism - is lies.
The law says so.
Q.E.D., bitches. Deal with it.
3/11/2011 8:43:42 AM