And I wonder, wouldn't it be easier for the government to invent a more infectious bacteria which would kill directly, instead of inventing a virus which infects for no good reason?
4/29/2008 9:29:07 PM
Wouldn't it be better to use something quicker? I mean AIDS can take up to 10 years to kill someone, and it costs millions of dollars while their alive.
Ebola can kill within a week, wouldn't that be a much more effective disease?
4/29/2008 9:32:35 PM
A old one.
4/29/2008 9:33:16 PM
Allegory for Jesus
There are medicines used to treat HIV? And here I thought that there was no cure for AIDS, and the only medication given to AIDS patient is used predominantly to mitigate the effects of having a damaged immune system...but it is obviously a plot by the government, you're right.
4/29/2008 9:37:06 PM
name goes here
you stole that from Deus Ex.
4/29/2008 9:45:58 PM
Besides, AIDS was killing long before those medicines appeared. Are they going to invent medicines for an illness which doesn't exist?
4/29/2008 11:27:34 PM
The government admitted engineering AIDS? When did that happen? I missed that one...which is strange because you'd think the outrage that woud be cause by such an admital would result in a media storm and most likely civil unrest!
4/30/2008 12:51:35 PM
Riiiiight. You fail at biology.
4/30/2008 4:58:54 PM
Agreeing with Antichrist, partially because I just agree, but partly because I'm a bit of an Ebola... fangirl, so to speak.
5/1/2008 4:43:25 PM
This guy MUST know that he's spewing pure nonsense. I mean, you CAN'T seriously believe this kind of stupidity. What kind of person can type such misinformed bullshit and think to themselves "Yeah, AIDS being engineered by the gov't as a means of population control makes perfect sense"? Feach, you're either an idiot or a liar.
5/5/2008 10:39:53 AM
jabba the slut
alright go stick your dick in every hooker you can come in contact with.
6/24/2010 8:26:44 PM