Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 38468

And without faith you have nothing. http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/len...

Any time something is partially false then it can’t be accepted as true. While evolution has compelling facts not all of it has been proven. Until all of it can be proven then it has to be accepted as theory. Even a liberal should be able to understand that.

There are even theories of divine intervention taking place DURING evolution. That would give another explanation, but of course you can’t accept that either. You can accept nothing but your way. You offer no reason for not allowing creationism to be taught along with other theories other than "it doesn't belong"? That's a weak argument.

You remind me of a jealous husband who is so insecure of himself that he goes berserk when his wife looks at another guy. If you so sure of yourself you shouldn’t mind other’s points of view and not try to stop others from seeing it.

Diogenes, Topix 9 Comments [4/30/2008 5:14:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Fek'lhr
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
aaa

*Groan*

5/31/2008 6:23:51 AM

Katsuro

The word "theory" doesn't mean what I suspect you think it means.

5/31/2008 7:04:13 AM

Beeblebrox

You remind me of a jealous husband who is so insecure of himself that he goes berserk when his wife looks at another guy.

When the Israelites worshipped the golden calf Jehovah sent fiery serpents among them which killed them and made the quite ill. Which one of us is a jealous husband?

5/31/2008 7:34:33 AM

CJ

Well, evolution *is* accepted as a theory--but I don't think that word means what you think it does.

I don't mind others having a different point of view. You can believe any damn fairy tale you want. I'm not going to try to stop anybody from seeing your point of view. But you're not going to teach your fairy tale to my kids and call it "science," and you're not going to try to change the laws in this country to fit what you think your imaginary sky daddy wants. That's where I draw the line.

6/1/2008 12:40:03 AM

Dharmabum

Science isn't a popularity contest, bozo.

6/1/2008 1:08:20 AM

Reverend Jeremiah

err..how about the fact that creationism is based on obvious myth.

10/1/2008 1:59:37 AM

Crimson Lizard

And you remind me of a bucket of shit!
(points for reference)

Diogenes? Don't make me laugh my guts out. You've got some serious nerve taking that name when, judging by this example, you couldn't philosophize your way out of a wet paper bag.

12/28/2012 11:30:30 PM

Dr. Shrinker

"Until all of it can be proven then it has to be accepted as theory. Even a liberal should be able to understand that."

- You're rather patronizing form someone who doesn't understand what the word 'theory' means in a scientific context.


"There are even theories of divine intervention taking place DURING evolution."

- Without evidence, they are no theories. They are quaint notions.


"That would give another explanation, but of course you can’t accept that either."

- Not without evidence I can't.


"You offer no reason for not allowing creationism to be taught along with other theories..."

- I have an excellent reason: creationism has nothing to support it except biblical mythology.


"If you so sure of yourself you shouldn’t mind other’s points of view and not try to stop others from seeing it."

- Yeah,your religion is a fine example of that, isn't it?

12/29/2012 7:40:51 AM

xyz

There is no such thing as "absolute proof". Science deals with evidence, and there is a vast amount of evidence for evolution. On the other hand, there is no evidence of an intelligent designer. Therefore, it makes no sense to teach creationism.

12/29/2012 1:24:03 PM
1