And not only everything i've read but also,,,
Christians don't write history, they adapt it.
Isn't Mithraism the religion of those who recieved the letters of Paul, who origionated the practice of Christianity in Rome? Whos people so readily adopted the new religion as it so resembled the traditional one? Who became Lion food because they were worshiping a God the state hadn't approved?
I think I think so, evidence backs it.
Oh, and I Believe you should be respectful of Horus, it's Horus the Krist. Or as Egyptian kids said back then, Horus Fuckin' Krist, the annoited one. Heard of him biiaatch?
The revered and real people that resemble your Christ are 30 fold at least,and most preceed him by a thousand years.
Dawkins has said " the quickest way to be an Atheist is to read the Bible" This is true, and agreed upon by the Atheist consenses. But there's a different route.
I started studying the Biblical roots after getting into Greek and Nordic mythology (via Marvel comics first, then finding these legends chronicles in mythology books) I started looking into Christianties roots about 25 years ago and found comfirmation in libraries with todays internet. I'm talking about respected historians who studied these subject for years and provide multiple (way beyond any Biblical (as in only source) evidence.
It's a patchwork religion. Can't be nailed to one source and is reflected by many earlier myth. Jesus is the worst, you put him at two thousand years ago but documents and holy tombs of the time and before don't mention him or his life, but many preceed him in life events, miracles,ultimate end and rebirth (3 days yet)
Like I said, I didn't read the whole Bible but I undertook thirty years of study (cause I like Gods, especially pantheons of Gods as a hobby)and found the Bible not only unbelievable (as the others) but illogical, ignoble and insane. I get a jealous family or race of gods. But one? That's stupid at the gate.