Nonsence. There are no transitional forms, never have been, and no fossil demonstrates transition. All the prominant evo scientists have confirmed it in their own words, in theor own books!
39 comments
Nonsence.[citation needed] There are no transitional forms[citation needed], never have been[citation needed], and no fossil demonstrates transition.[citation needed] All the prominant evo scientists have confirmed it in their own words, in theor own books![citation needed]
WRONG, there are transitional fossils, ever heard of archaeopteryx? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx ).
Really? are you so certain about that? why don't you cite a few examples of those evo scientists claiming that? Since there are so many it must be quite easy, right?
Unless you are a palaeontologist, you are not qualified to render an opinion. The real players in that field, whether they agree on various details or not, are either shaking their heads, shrugging, or laughing at you.
I'm not even qualified to call myself a student, still I understand the basic concepts, unlike you.
"Nonsence. There are no transitional forms, never have been, and no fossil demonstrates transition."
Try going to a natural history museum. They're full of the things.
"All the prominant evo scientists have confirmed it in their own words, in theor own books!"
I assume you mean that Gould quote (if I'm recalling it correctly). Why don't you try reading it all in context or reading what Gould himself said about the quote you guys keep using.
First, spell 'Nonsense' right, ok?
Archaeopteryx. Suck it up, asshole!
"Nonsence" is misspelled. (-1)
There are transitional forms such as lancelets, amphisbania, coelocanth are just a few. Plus countless plants and microscopic life forms. All these groups include species which have been observed to change exactly as prediceted by evolutionary biological theory. (-2)
Almost every identified fossil can be classified and assigned it's proper place in the "tree of lie" based on observed similarities and differences in comparison to other life forms living and dead.(-3)
So, one could argue that all fossils are transitional. This argument gains weight when one considers that traits found in dinosaur fossils are clearly analogous to those in existing birds and some structures from ancient invertebrates are shared by their chordate descendants including humans.(-4)
Simply using the phrase "prominant evo scientists" (In addition to misspelling p-r-o-m-i-n-E-n-t and using the meaningless "evo" as an epithet.) proves that you have only heard about these scientists from people like Kent Hovind, Ken Ham and assorted televangelists, and you have never read or comprehended anything remotely resembling a rational description of evolutionary biology. (-5)
To claim that these scientists confirmed evolution was "nonsence" (sic) "in their own words, in theor (sic)own books"is a flat out lie. (-6) And it's not even original.(-7) [NOTE: The near certainty that this idiot has been lied to prevents me from awarding extra negative points.]
That is some concentrated FAIL!
Non-sense. There is not such thing as gravity, never has been, and no data demonstrates gravity. All the prominent physicists have confirmed it in their own words, in their own books!
btw, guys, any species that went extinct before any new species could evolve from it is NOT a transitional fossil. Just so you know. Not ALL fossils are transitional fossils, though most are.
Nonsence. There are no transitional forms, never have been, and no fossil demonstrates transition. All the prominant evo scientists have confirmed it in their own words, in theor own books!
It took me exactly 10 seconds--just long enough to type the words "transitional fossils" into a search engine---to find site after site offering scientific evidence of transitional fossils. I guess you idiots figure if you keep saying something long enough it'll eventually become true.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional/part1a.html#fish
Scientists now have som many transitional fossils of some species that it's no longer clear where on species ends and another begins, or whether a fossil is a distinct species or merely a variation of the same species.
This fundie is just burying his head in the sand, like an ostrich. Also, like an ostrich, I do beliee that Nephilimfree's eyeballs are larger than his brain.
We have the tiktalik. We win.
We have the the archeopterix. We win again.
We have the Australopithecus. We win again.
We have the protoceratops and the monoclonius. Double win!
You have a bronze age myth. You lose.
Citations, please. Love to see 'em. And no, not Bible quotes, or "scientists" whose degrees are from fundie diploma mills and whose jobs are as pr flacks for the Discovery Institute.
Creationist debate technique.
1) Close eyes
2) Insert left index finger into left ear
3) Insert right index finger into right ear
4) Yell "Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus Jesus"
5) Repeat step 4 until end of debate.
"Nonsence. There are no transitional forms, never have been, and no fossil demonstrates transition. All the prominant evo scientists have confirmed it in their own words, in theor own books!"
Ahem. Archaeopteryx?
of COURSE no fossil demonstrates transition, just as you cannot measure speed from a still photograph. A sequence of photos, or fossils, can demonstrate change and the rate at which it took place.
tl;dr - this guy is a moron
first, a functional transitional form does not exist because evolution does not happen with a final design in plan. lifeforms change, sometimes randomly, to better survive changes in their surroundings, but this affects population gene pools, not individuals.
second, there's a mr. 'Tiktaliik' who'd like to speak with you.
third, why do I even bother, you're not going to listen.
NephilimFree just does not get the concept of evidence. He's completely divorced from reality. This is one of the most sane and sensible things NephilimFree has said. Just think about that.
NephilimFree is a geocentrist. NephilimFree thinks the craters on the moon were caused by the Noachian flood.
NephilimFree is so completely delusional that I wouldn't be surprised if he made a video tomorrow saying the earth was flat, that time was cubic, and that anyone who doesn't wear clunky headphones will have their ears bitten off by a giant pink lemur wearing a polka-dot fedora.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.