Anon-e-moose
(emph-ass-is added):
"ID is a scientific theory...not a Christian or creationist theory. Most people think that ID is something the Christians came up with-this is not true.
I may be mistaken...its not my field"
'I may be mistaken', eh?:
image
Do give up your day job - and spend the rest of your life in your field, with the rest of your fluff-headed sheeple, Revviepoos.
"There are a large group of scientist who have taken a public stand against Darwinism. It is from this group that ID has been revived"
'Large'. Yeah. Right. [/hyper-sarcasm]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Behe#Dover_testimony
Professor of Biochemistry and Cre(a)ti(o)nist, Michael Behe. Frankly, the fact he could hold lectures in phone boxes and still have plenty of room for anyone who he thinks would be interested in listening, post-late 2005, is the least of his problems. Nor for the above which utterly annhilated his credibility in the scientific establishment.
It is his 'testimony' in Kitzmiller vs. Dover which - via it's landmark & precedent-setting decision - utterly destroyed the entire Religious Reich's educational agenda forever and ever RAmen.
...oh, and 'There are a large group of scientist who have taken a public stand against Darwinism'. 'Large group of scientist who have taken a public stand'. 'Scientist', as in the singular. Like I say: Michael Behe, post-late 2005, and the consequences of that decision upon his credibility in public afterwards. 'Scientist'. Singular. Very telling, Al. >:D
