i mean its so obvious look around u everywhere
scientifically god makes more since.. in science
everything has to come frm sumthing...i meen hello wat came first the chicken or the egg!? nd that whole big bang theory...i mean lol GOD MAKES MORE SENSE and the one about the asteroids like all colliding nd crap nd here we are!...well hi science! where did those asteroids come frm theres so many other points and just obvious stuff in science gods the best theory y cant ppl c that?!
40 comments
So if you're so smart, I assume you can tell me where God came from, right?
Yeah, that's what I thought, you fucking retard.
@[b]David D.G.:
Not necessarily. While it is logically correct to say that eggs themselves came before chickens, the actual meaning of the question is probably more accurately stated: "What came first, the chicken egg or the chicken?" This question, while not causing too much mental anguish as to the order of the events (Chicken's ancestor lays an egg, which bears a modern, evolved chicken) depends on how you define a chicken egg. Is a chicken egg an egg that bears a chicken, (If so, the egg came first.) or is a chicken egg an egg laid by a chicken? (In this instance, the chicken comes first.)
Of course, no clear agreement shall be reached on this question, but I'll wager that the answer is probably tied into an individual's view on abortion. Pro-life advocates, who believe the potential for a life makes life, would probably call the first instance of the egg (the one that bears the first chicken) a chicken egg. Conversely, pro-choicers would most likely identify a chicken egg as an egg coming from a chicken.
So you see, the answer to the "Chicken or egg?" question depends on abortion. Pro-choice? The chicken came first. Pro-life? The egg.
(I apologize for this tangent. I was bored.)
@The Devil's Advocate
So you see, the answer to the "Chicken or egg?" question depends on abortion. Pro-choice? The chicken came first. Pro-life? The egg.
Except to pro-lifers, the egg is a chicken, which really screws the question.
The Big Bang doesn't make a whole lot of sense [I subscribe to a much more insane theory which is unprovable but which makes sense to me], but evolution undoubtedly occurred and evolution explains the origin of species. Life itself started with amino acids and goop and that sort of thing.
God doesn't make any sense because you're explaining the creation of complex life with something impossibly more complex. You must, by your own logic, ask where God came from.
Asteroids was a video game in the 80's, not a scientific theory.
God makes more sense to you because it's a ridiculously simplified means of explaining how the universe began. Most things in reality are far too complex for you to fathom, yet for some reason you seem to think that the event that caused to universe to exist should be incredibly simple and explained in no more than one sentence. The creationist version of the beginning of the universe is far more simple than the reason water freezes. Why would the creation of the universe be the simplest thing to understand in science?
"I fucking hate text speak."
As do I Ambrielle, as do I.
Not as much as I hate... "She goes..." "He went.." or "I'm all like.."
The FUCKING word is SAID, S A I D, SAID!
"u" "frm" "meen" "wat" "nd" "y" "ppl" "c"
Your obvious educational inferiority means you cannot form a cogent thought, therefore you are incapable of formulating an opinion in the first place. Come back, when you have a university degree in Theoretical Physics/Cosmology, then we'll talk.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.