ID prove(s) genetically that the human species did not Evolve out of other life forms, which amazingly Evolutionism propagate(s) we did, when overwhelming scientific (DNA) evidence(s) disprove(s), but still it is taught as fact.
This is why, I believe that Creationism & Evolutionism should only be taught in the home(s) & not the school(s) to avoid even more confusion.
54 comments
ID prove(s) genetically that the human species did not Evolve out of other life forms, which amazingly Evolutionism propagate(s) we did, when overwhelming scientific (DNA) evidence(s) disprove(s), but still it is taught as fact.
Show us the evidence ;)
"ID prove(s) genetically that the human species did not Evolve out of other life forms, which amazingly Evolutionism propagate(s) we did, when overwhelming scientific (DNA) evidence(s) disprove(s), but still it is taught as fact."
How strange. All the experts agree that DNA analysis is one of the strongest pieces of evidence we have that we actually did evolve from other life forms.
If we're such a completely unique "creation" why do we share so much of our DNA with other creatures?
"This is why, I believe that Creationism & Evolutionism should only be taught in the home(s) & not the school(s) to avoid even more confusion."
Fortunately what you believe doesn't mean much.
You know(s), this guy's typing(s) is all(s) too easy to make(s) fun(s) of.
And I'd like(s) to see(s) his "overwhelming scientific evidence(s)". If it exist(s), it's new to me
1. ID has yet to prove anything.
ID prove(s) genetically that the human species did not Evolve out of other life forms
Nonsense. The genetic evidence is that humans and chimps share a common ancestor. It's the same genetic evidence used in paternity testing.
Well... according to mitochondrial DNA testing, you're full of shit. DNA tests do confirm evolution, you nutjob. Where do you find your 'facts'?
You try learning a few real ones. The first you should start with is that ID doesn't prove anything. In fact it doesn't make any scientific claims at all. The only thing it does do is attempt to punch holes in evolution which it's failed to do repeatedly.
that's odd because I seem to recall reading several dozen, if not hundred, choice pieces of scientific literature that explicitly shows DNA evidence in favor of evolution. Not only that, but Intentional Dumbening doesn't have any evidence at all and as a result doesn't even have a single consistent model since people make up whatever they want and just run with it as though it's fact.
I trot this fact out for folks like Sheol. As a type 1 diabetic, I must take insulin on a daily basis. One of the insulins I use is manufactured from a bacteria. Genetically, it mirrors human insulin produced in a human pancreas. Gee, Sheol, how does this happen? Many diabetics use this type of insulin rather than the beef or pork formulations of the past. I love my friend, the bacteria.
It's not "Evolutionism", it's "Biology", stupid.
Evidence only comes in singular, stupid.
OK, I think you maxed out your parentheses quota with this. Please cease to use another parenthesis for at least a year, otherwise we will be forced to bill you.
Thank you. Now get back to your insane ramblings.
HOW doe(s) ID prove that genetically? The fact that we share 98 percent of our DNA with Chimpanzees and Bonobos (and around 50 percent with cucumbers) somehow prove(s) that we are not related? If it does, how come Behe didn't bring it up during the Kitzmiller vs Dover trial?
Evidence only comes in the singular, dipshit.
Biology should be taught in schools, beliefs at home.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
