1. Between the living and non-living or dead matter;
Not at all understood, but since Miller and Urey's results have been repeated a number of times with different chemical mixtures and the same basic outcome, nobody really thinks it's impossible.
2. Between the vegetable and the animal kingdoms;
It didn't happen sequentially -- they developed from different kinds of eukaryote organisms. Plants (with chloroplasts) went one way, fungi and animals (with mitochondria) went another. The common line of descent ends somewhat before any of the above would be recognized as plants, animals, or fungi.
3. Between the invertebrates and the vertebrates;
There's substantial evidence of similarity among modern species. Amphioxus, though a bit further off the tree than originally thought, is almost a textbook example of what a protofish might look like. Tunicates have very similar DNA to basal vertebrates, and hagfish and lampreys descend directly from the earliest forms of fish. And echinoderms aren't that far separated from chordates on the family tree.
4. Between marine animals and amphibians;
Because no one has ever seen fossils of Tiktaalik, Ichthyostega, Acanthostega, etc., nor are there even now transitional forms such as lungfish, anableps, and snakeheads capable of surviving for some time out of water.
5. Between amphibians and reptiles;
Well, I think the canonical "missing link" is Seymouria, but there are plenty of other proto-amniotes in the fossil record.
6. Between reptiles and birds;
Much of the dromaeosaur family (from which birds descend) as well as several other saurischian families are now believed or known to have had feathers. Even if we hadn't found Archaeopteryx, DNA similarities would have sussed it out eventually.
7. Between reptiles and mammals;
Cynodont therapsids. Monotremes. Some reconstructions of the former even make them look remarkably mammalian.
8. Between mammals and the human body;
We are mammals. The similarities -- hair, milk production, bone structure, smelling strange when sweaty -- are trivial to demonstrate.
9. Between soulless simians and the soul of man, bearing the image of God.
Well, if you consider the soul an open question, that's sort of irrelevant, isn't it? Interesting that you say that the soul is the image of God though, rather than the body -- rather unbiblical, yeah?
