But this is so true. The environmental, animal rights, evolutionist and green movements are all anti-democracy/ anti-life/ anti-God at their core.
48 comments
The environmental, animal rights and green movements, that is, movements based on the preservation and protection of life are anti-life?
And the theory of evolution, which is a field of science and not a movement, as the understanding of life, is also anti-life?
How do you figure?
Please don't mix evolution with the rest of that lot.
And as much as I dislike animal rights (there is a difference between animal RIGHTS and animal WELFARE) no, they're not anti-God or anti-life "at their core". None of them are. Not even evolution.
Hey, corholeboy, get a life, learn to read, then do, by all means, read.
"Grrrrrr! I hate life! I hate all life! And democracy too! How I hate that fucking democracy! And don't even get me started on God! If only there were some worldview that would make my anti life/demoracy/God stance more popular..."
Charles Darwin, in a letter to a friend, 1831.
I was thinking about writing a lengthy rant why you are so stupid, but I've decided to only point out one and probably a major flaw in your thinking.
You just said, that it "is so true", which means you are thinking in extremes or absolutes. Nothing is absolutely "true" or "wrong", our democratic societies aren't exactly the ideal realization of the exact definition of the word, life does not start with at the exact moment conception and god is a fairy tale that the rich and powerful endorsed to fool the masses into obedience. It's black and white thinking, you are in the literal meaning of the word, a fundamentalist and THAT doesn't allow you to see the truth in the gray-area.
The environmental movement focuses on protecting earth's natural resourses to the greatest extent possible. This is neither anti-democracy, anti-life, or anti-God.
The animal rights movement focuses on preventing uneccesary harm to animals. This is neither anti democracy or anti-God, and is in fact pro-life.
Evolution is not a movement, it is a scientific theory. Regardless, it is not anti-democracy, anti-life, or anti-God.
The green movement is no different from the the environmental movement, so I'm a bit confused as to why you included this twice.
Overall, very poor. F- and see me after class.
Every time I see "anti-life", my immediate thought is "DARKSEID!" And then, "Oh, Superman will kick his ass again. He always does. Or the Phantom Stranger will show up and lay down some awesomely classy condemnatory smack talk."
I read far too many comic-books.
But anyway, I fail to see the correlation between "I care for other beings on the planet, sentient or not, and about the planet itself" as being anti-democracy/anti-life (DARKSEID!)/anti-God. Didn't God say we were supposed to take care of this shit down here, anyway?
everyone that i disagree with are evil, kommunists, murderers, anti-democratic and supporters of sharia law.
So i don't need to know anything about what their positions are.
"Kill! Kill for life!" -DaMentalFunism
Funnily enough, that put me in mind of this:
"Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity." -George Carlin
And thank you for reminding me of that. ^_^
no, no, not necessarily.
The people you're thinking of are trying to save the human race from its own stupidity, except for animal rights, who are making a moral choice where there is really no obligation for us as a race to do anything.
They are arguably anti-capitalist. Not any of what you said, though.
So,,, to be pro-god means you have to be anti-environment, anti-animal rights and anti-green? Sure, why not,,,, screw up your planet and your sky pixie will make you a new one,,,,, or is that, screw the planet, we're going to be ruptured?
As soon as someone writes "but this is so true", I know the rest of what they have to say will be wrong, stupid, a pack of lies or a combination of all three. Popcornboy, you just hit the trifecta.
It's true that organizations like Greenpeace, Earth First!, and PETA do have a strong left-wing political bias. The term "watermelon" was coined to describe this phenomenon ("green on the outside, pinko on the inside!").
That being said, evolution doesn't even belong in the same ballpark.
Yes, because God would hate the thought of being kind to animals and saving the Earth.
I would think those values pretty much in line with the Bible, but Republicans have a stranglehold on Christianity, which pretty much makes all right-wing ideology immediately and unshakeably moral in the eyes of most devout Christians.
God I fucking hate Republicans.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.