"also I found something intresting my teacher told us. For many years the bible was thought of as a lie because ( I forgot what the name was) it spoke of a acient city that was not real so therefore untrue"
Such a thing would not invalidate an entire work. Just as the opposite, such as citing a city that did exist would not automatically validate an entire work. It simply validates, or invalidates, that particular claim.
It's the supernatural bullshit that is inextricably linked to all the rest of the factual stuff that invalidates your Babble.
"But several years later they FOUND the city underground."
And? So what?
"The bible is indeed the word of GOD."
Based on what? That the writer happened to be bright enough to have written about a major fucking city that we were able to discover the remains of?
Do you realize how stupid this is? It's like I write that I'm god incarnate, saved the world from a giant purple space amoeba by giving it a stern lecture and then I poofed myself out of existence. And it all took place in Time Square in New York city. Now, four thousand years from now when someone finds the remains of New York city would that validate the rest of the claims I made?
"Ever wonder when we say the name Jesus everyone crinches or their hearts jump or they simply refuse to hear anything aboult it."
Because half of the people are scared shitless that he's finally come and they're not going to make the cut and the other half are sick and tired of hearing about Jebus every time they turn around.
"Its because that name gives of so much power."
You are aware that "Jesus" was not his actual name, right? It's an Anglicization of the Greek form of his name which, itself, was a Hellenization of the Hebrew Yehoshua or the Hebrew-Aramaic Yeshua. And, by a fucking amazing coincidence, Yeshua just happens to mean "YHWH rescues." Well, it's an amazing coincidence unless you figure out that the entire fucking story of the Gospels--and thereby the name of your Savior--are simply fabrications and the authors chose such a name for a literary purpose. Here's another hint, "Christ" was not his surname.
"Try to prove the bible wrong; u cant."
Leviticus 11:22-23
Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.
But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.
The Bible states, quite clearly, that insects have four legs. Reality states without doubt that no insects exist now or have existed in the past with four legs.
Ergo, the Babble is wrong. Again.