I'm not clueless your clueless. You don't believe in Jesus so you're clueless. Jesus is scientifically proven to be the real lord and if you don't believe that you're clueless. Look at the dead see scrolls and the shroud of Turin. All positively scientifically proven. If science proves something then it's real.
52 comments
Ok, then you have to accept that evolution is real, that global warming exists, that earthquakes are from platonic shifts, and all that good stuff too
Please provide the credible, peer-reviewed papers "scientifically proving" Jesus to be the real lord.
Even if the shroud was authentic (which it is not), all it would prove is that is was wrapped around a dead Jesus, it would not prove that Jesus is/was the "reak lord."
Like evolution, or the earth being 4.6 billion years old.
Itswings both ways, asshole.
The Dead Sea Scrolls contain NOT ONE mention of Jesus(OT books only), and the Shroud of Turin has been proven to be a fourteenth century fraud(yet again), kinda like the forest of pieces of the true cross and 600 different nails and spikes from the cross in mideval monasteries and nunneries across Europe, clueless.
"I'm not clueless your clueless."
"You don't believe in Jesus so you're clueless."
"Jesus is scientifically proven to be the real lord and if you don't believe that you're clueless."
"Look at the dead see scrolls and the shroud of Turin"
"All positively scientifically proven"
"If science proves something then it's real."
You fail to make a single intelligent statement. Better luck next time baby, someone will be waiting down the line.
@daken: that earthquakes are from platonic shifts
Ooo, that must explain why I felt the earth move last night!
On the shroud of Turin..
It is my understanding that the section dated on the shroud of turin was said to have been a piece that was repaired during the 14th century, thus the returned date. After a request was made to then take another sample of the Shroud, the catholic church barred anymore examinations and performed their own restoration process that invalidated any further testing.
"Jesus is scientifically proven"
and what's your proof?
"Look at the dead see scrolls"
Those were written after the events dumbass.
The shroud of Turin was positively scientifically proven... to be a hoax from around the 16th century.
(edit: reading comments, maybe 14th. I'm not sure.)
"It is my understanding that the section dated on the shroud of turin was said to have been a piece that was repaired during the 14th century, thus the returned date. After a request was made to then take another sample of the Shroud, the catholic church barred anymore examinations and performed their own restoration process that invalidated any further testing . "
Well, how convenient.
"ZOMG! It might be fake! Quick, let's fix it so they can't test it anymore!!11!one!"
I imagine Bob having one of those "improve your vocabulary one word a day" calendars (for morons, mind you) and trying to use the day's word as often as he can. Yesterday's word was "stupid". Today it's "clueless"...
Seriously, Bob, buy yourself a bag of new adjectives. They're awesome (<- here, you can have that one for free ;-)).
"I'm not clueless your clueless. You don't believe in Jesus so you're clueless. Jesus is scientifically proven to be the real lord and if you don't believe that you're clueless."
Bob, buddy, do yourself a favor and buy a thesaurus. There's a whole language full of words that you can use besides "clueless".
"Look at the dead see scrolls and the shroud of Turin. All positively scientifically proven."
Yes, all scientifically proven... to exist. And that's about it. Science does not validate the contents of the Dead Sea Scrolls, nor does it validate the Shroud of Turin as being a burial cloth for Christ.
"If science proves something then it's real."
Not quite. If evidence "proves" something, then it's real whether or not science actually happens to be studying it.
Look at the dead see scrolls and the shroud of Turin.
The Dead Sea Scrolls deal with the Old Testament. They don't mention Jesus. The only available test of the shroud dated it in the Middle Ages. Supporters predictably say the dating is wrong because it was based on a single area of the shroud (the only one the owners would allow to be tested). If they used some other area, they'd no doubt come up with some other excuse for not believing it.
The Dead Sea Scrolls have jack shit to do with Jesus.
The Shroud of Turin also is thought by some to be a fake, but until I see the method of how to fake it in a video or something I'll hold judgement.
Side effects may include drowsiness, dry mouth, diarrhea, Schizophrenia, racism, obsession with death of self and others, lying, tax evasion, voting Republican, and a diminished command of the English language.
Jesus is scientifically proven to be the real lord and if you don't believe that you're clueless.
Look at the dead see scrolls and the shroud of Turin.
If science proves something then it's real.
"If science proves something then it's real."
EVOFUCKINGLUTION!!!
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
