Gravity is still a theory, you idiot. Theories are theories because they survived peer review long enough to form a tangible set of explanations, data, and reasoning. Evolution is just as valid and heavily researched as gravity.
Here. I'll even summarize what sets a theory aside from a law; A law of science is an observable and constant behavior across all environments. A hard, inflexible constant. Gravity is not a hard inflexible constant, it's a variable force which we can understand and observe the effects of in a wide range of environments. Evolution is not a hard inflexible constant, it's a variable metaphorical force, which we can understand and observe the effects of in a wide range of biomes.
No. Difference.
Do you know what science does to review things? I'll put it to you metaphorically, because you are clearly too bloody stupid to grasp the actual process. Science loads proposed ideas into a cannon. It fires them into a wall of unyielding, steel-hard minds and the finest research apparatus around. It is not kind about its testing. Do you know what becomes a theory, and not a hypothesis?
The ideas that survive being shot from that metaphorical cannon, every single time. Even a little chip in the idea is enough that it can't be taken as fact until it survives its next smash-test whole. Evolution's time and time again, survived shot after shot; It does happen, it's demonstrable, the mechanism by which it occurs is clear and observable in real time, and the historical data fits present experimentation. Nylonase bacteria. London tube mosquitoes. The Galapagos finches. MRSA. Evolution is as strong a theory as gravity.
Creation science? Yeah. Demonstrate to me where that survived the hypothetical stage. Please.
