And further on - two years to be exact - in Kitzmiller vs. Dover, the evidence & testimony of it ['Intelligent Design'] didn't meet any of the qualifications of the stringent, fact-based deliberations of the Christian Conservative Judge John E. Jones III, except making a complete laughingstock of the defence's case:
image
(which AFTER observation, didn't need to be arguable to make it invalid)
As a result of which, after Judge Jones' decision:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District#Decision
Was the final nail knocked into the coffin of the whole Evolution (Atheism) vs Creationism (Religion) debate. And guess who was the hammer-wielding funeral director, and who was the rotting, pustulent corpse finally laid to rest?
Thus via 'Intelligent Design' (and by definition, Creationism) not meeting any of the quallifications of the Scientific Method - and instead dcemonstrating the Scientifuic(k up) Method, therefore Evolution is fact. Creationism is lies. The law says so (Romans 13:1-5, and all that jazz).
Deal with it.
@Big One
"I don't know what is this Scientifuic Method you're talking about."
'[Sic] Transit Gloria Mundi' Award, anyone? ('Sic Transit Gloria Mundi' translates as 'Gloria threw up in the back of the van on the 2nd day of the week' [/smartarse] X3 )