Quote# 43868

[Question on Yahoo Answers]

Can evolutionists answer this?

When and why did evolution decide to punish women for having multiple partners?

Within the last few years (I don't know exactly when) scientists found a link between a womans reproduction system and her immune system.

The first time she has intercourse, the DNA is imprinted. after this when a mans DNA is injected, it is checked against the imprint. If it is the same, everything is ok. If it is different, the imprint is removed and the knew DNA is imprinted. This can only happen 2 times. Even if the 3 DNA is the same as the first, it still is the 3rd imprint. After this the immune system will attack the next 3 mens DNA, even if one is from a previous man. then the immune system will step down a level. I do not know what that means exactly, but I do know it means the woman can get sick easier, and recovers slower.

This link serves no purpose if evolution is true, and would in fact hinder a womans ability to have babies from different fathers if anything happened to the first one.

Dinger, Yahoo Answers 88 Comments [7/30/2008 8:35:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 14
Submitted By: Lola

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 4 | bottom


And why did evolution give men nipples? :)

I think it's so we can get them pierced

7/30/2008 8:34:04 AM


"When and why did evolution decide to punish women for having multiple partners?"

It didn't. Case closed.

7/30/2008 8:34:55 AM


You made that all up, didn't you?

7/30/2008 8:36:02 AM


Sounds like bullshit to me.

7/30/2008 8:36:58 AM



7/30/2008 8:39:17 AM

Milking the Catz

7/30/2008 8:40:50 AM



7/30/2008 8:42:21 AM


Is that even true?


7/30/2008 8:54:26 AM


Fail at biology and health class. What a shame you should just kill yourself now.

7/30/2008 8:54:38 AM


I love the guy who suggests he's thinking of DVD region codes.

7/30/2008 9:00:30 AM

Paschal Wagner

[citation needed]

7/30/2008 9:06:07 AM


[citation seriously fucking needed]

7/30/2008 9:15:55 AM


The stoopid. It burnssss ussss....

But they ARE imaginative, aren't they?

7/30/2008 9:33:04 AM

Capn' Mel

Omfg you're stupid.

Shoot me now.

7/30/2008 10:12:15 AM


"Can evolutionists answer this?"

Yes, you're a moron with less than an idiot's grasp of biology.

7/30/2008 10:39:06 AM

Did they just not have science classes where these people went to school?

7/30/2008 10:46:31 AM

Cosmic Muffin

There you see the dangers of home-schooling. One should always check references. Over an above that, one needs to know that The Weekly World News is not a valid reference.

7/30/2008 10:51:57 AM

Captain Janeway

If this is true, it doesn't diminish evolutionary biology in anyway. So just what is this funtard trying to say? That Dog designed women to have up to 3 male partners? That's still 2 more than fundies would allow....

7/30/2008 11:09:30 AM


Stu-pid is a stupid does.

*shakes head, sighs and walks off*

7/30/2008 11:22:13 AM


The stupid makes my head hurt.

I do believe a citation is in order here. Prove those fucktardinous assertions, oh master of biology.

7/30/2008 11:37:28 AM


Thank you Dr. Dinger, professor of Pulledoutofmyassology at the university of Fail.

7/30/2008 11:59:05 AM

Dan Onymous

I blatantly agree with the guy who thinks he's getting mixed up with DVD region codes. The DVD rewriter in my PC allows you to change the region code only three times.

7/30/2008 12:00:18 PM


Heh, those are DRM, right ? (Digital Reproduction Management)

And now, I'll try and not think of what “digital reproduction” can be interpreted to. Seriously. >;->

7/30/2008 12:08:42 PM

Mister Spak

" I do not know what that means exactly, "

If you don't provide a link, it means you are making shit up.

7/30/2008 12:24:37 PM


Citation, biatch!!!

7/30/2008 12:26:44 PM

1 2 3 4 | top: comments page