1 2
#606412
Godbuster
bla
7/30/2008 3:52:20 PM
#606419
aaa
Groan...
7/30/2008 3:55:26 PM
#606420
Doctor Whom
You're persecuting us by not standing by passively as we persecute you. Waaaaaaaaaaah!
7/30/2008 3:55:57 PM
#606421
inmate22841
Summary of paragraph 1:
"Everyone thinks we are narrow minded."
Summary of paragraph 2:
"Everyone different to us is possessed by demons and deserves to die."
7/30/2008 3:56:32 PM
#606425
Dan Onymous
"But have those involved in sexual liberation, considered that occult forces might be infiltrating, and taking captive of their souls?"
Probably not. But have those involved in sexual repression considered that occult forces might not be infiltrating and taking captive other people's souls?
7/30/2008 3:58:56 PM
#606436
Allegory for Jesus
"with christians being thought as narrow-minded, and many of the political, media, and entertainment leaders supporting greater freedoms of sexual deviations."
Oh noez! Christian bigots are being called out as bigots and are not being supported as much as they were in the past! PERSECUTION!!!!
"A possible explanation for babies born with homosexual tendencies might be the sins of the parents, just as cocaine addiction or AIDS is sometimes transferred to the child."
Probably not, retard. Cocaine addiction is not caused by magic sin transferrence, but by exposing the fetus to cocaine, and thus making them chemically dependent while in the womb. And AIDS is a virus, not a magical curse, and is transferred to the fetus because it is in the body of the infected mother.
Being a bad person in whatever arbitrary fashion you can imagine does not cause one to give birth to a homosexual child.
7/30/2008 4:02:26 PM
#606459
Delmania
The sexual revolution occurred about 30 years ago. Homosexuality has been around a lot longer than that.
Also, many homosexuals produce heterosexual offspring, so that theory gets thrown out as well.
7/30/2008 4:11:04 PM
#606477
LordJiro
The shoe is on the other foot? So homosexuals are now an oppressive majority intent on stifling the rights of poor, downtrodden Christians?
7/30/2008 4:24:05 PM
#606482
John
A possible explanation for babies born with homosexual tendencies might be the sins of the parents
That would mean we should find more homosexuality among the children of murderers, thieves, adulterers, people who work on the Sabbath, etc. But don't wait for fundies to actually do the study. Fundie "science" consists of pulling stupid crap out of thin air and saying "you waste your time proving me wrong".
7/30/2008 4:37:08 PM
#606488
Grigadil
A healthy society accepts responsible and rational sub-groups. GLBTs have shown a willingness to play the game.
Bible queers are Chaos creatures. No healthy society needs people like that.
Do you feel the pressure? Are you getting a clue yet?
7/30/2008 4:40:11 PM
#606493
Lucilius
Yeah, 'cause STDs, marital problems, abortion inducers and social problems haven't existed since the dawn of history. They all were magically created by evil spirits in the 1960s.
7/30/2008 4:43:58 PM
#606497
Mister Spak
"The sexual revolution may’ve seemed like fun without a price, but homosexuality, divorces, abortions, and other social traumas, may’ve been a result."
Or, since Massachusetts has a low divorce rate and gay marriage, maybe you're full of shit.
7/30/2008 4:45:43 PM
#606514
Tom S. Fox
7/30/2008 4:59:36 PM
#606520
Jay-Sus
@ Tom S. Fox
Brilliant.
7/30/2008 5:01:52 PM
#606529
MantlePicture
Cocaine is not physically addictive, therefore addiction cannot be passed onto a fetus. The whole "crack baby" thing was just propaganda by the Reagan administration, and has been disproved.
7/30/2008 5:10:43 PM
#606544
JESUS PLEASE CUM SOON!
^^ Using coke or crack while pregnant can cause developmental problems, so it's not entirely a myth. Babies can be born addicted to opiates (heroin, morphine, etc.), which is really heartbreaking to see. You are correct, however, that cocaine isn't physically addictive.
Homosexuals complain about christians putting the pressure on them, but the shoe is on the other foot now, with christians being thought as narrow-minded
waahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh people on the internet make fun of me for being a narrow minded bigot wahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
7/30/2008 5:24:13 PM
#606549
kingoftheheavies
I have some news for you. Your gawd? He's t3h ghey.
7/30/2008 5:28:47 PM
#606566
anonymous_troy
Homosexuality is punishment for sin?
wth?
7/30/2008 5:47:46 PM
#606567
Sir Michael L. Foley
That's really great. Now find some proof that the mystical mumbojumbo known as 'sin' exists.
7/30/2008 5:50:49 PM
#606581
Cocaine is not physically addictive, therefore addiction cannot be passed onto a fetus. The whole "crack baby" thing was just propaganda by the Reagan administration, and has been disproved.
Tell that to mothers who gave birth to babies with narcotics-induced defects.
7/30/2008 5:57:36 PM
#606586
Brenz
"A possible explanation for babies born with homosexual tendencies might be the sins of the parents, just as cocaine addiction or AIDS is sometimes transferred to the child."
That's a charming God you worship there.
7/30/2008 5:59:33 PM
#606591
Jax
"Using coke or crack while pregnant can cause developmental problems, so it's not entirely a myth. Babies can be born addicted to opiates (heroin, morphine, etc.), which is really heartbreaking to see. You are correct, however, that cocaine isn't physically addictive."
I think you got it backwards. Cocaine is definitely physically addictive. You will go through withdrawal if you try to quit. What was disproven was the developmental problems. Doctors examined the cognitive behavior of babies, and they were told one group of babies were born to mothers who had been on cocaine and one group was not. In reality both groups were mixed. The doctors perceived a difference between the two groups presented to them, but not between the real "crack" babies and the real non-crack babies.
7/30/2008 6:02:43 PM
#606612
tracer
"The sins of the fathers are visited on the sons, to the third and fourth generation" ... is Bronze-age shepherd speak for "We don't know how genetically-inherited traits work; maybe it's because your parents did something wrong."
7/30/2008 6:18:18 PM
#606618
tracer
"but the shoe is on the other foot now"
Thank goodness. I've been wearing my left shoe on the right foot all morning, and it was killing me.
7/30/2008 6:20:44 PM
#606671
Wandering_Scribe
So, according to you:
A Spirit helping you find sexual pleasure = bad.
Letting the Spirit of Jesus do it for you = good.
If this Jesus fellow is the only Spirit that can be trusted, what kind of fucked up shit did he pull off in life that God forced him to be the only good Spirit, out of the existence of all spiritual things?
Sounds like he got gypped.
7/30/2008 7:11:19 PM
1 2