[Please direct any and all active irony meters away from your computation devices at this time. Thank you.]
Darwinism is the most failed hypothesis in the history of experimental and descriptive science. That failure expresses itself in the degenerate tactics the Darwinian mystics are now employing in dealing with their adversaries. No longer able to defend their dogma and lacking the intellectual and moral fiber to abandon it, now they can only lash out blindly at those who have always known that there was a purpose in the history of life, a history which I believe is now complete.
31 comments
My theory is that there is a rift between dimensions. This rift allows people through from other dimensions where, inexplicably, they are correct.
Another renegade biologist who thinks his dislike of evolution somehow makes him right and everyone else wrong. What the hell is Darwinism, anyways? I am positive he knows that our understanding of evolution has greatly surpassed what Darwin originally put forth. He's nothing more than a Behe clone.
What the hell is a Darwinian mystic? Last I checked, mystics were people who believe that they can communicate directly with God. So, I ask, again, WTF does a Darwinian mystic do?
There is no such things as "Darwinism" or "Darwinian mystics," jackass.
Also, it's a damned good thing I keep my irony meter in the same box with my cat, Schroedinger.
"Darwinism is the most failed hypothesis in the history of experimental and descriptive science."
Odd. That's not what all that scientific evidence from experimentation shows.
Maybe you're just reading it wrong.
"That failure expresses itself in the degenerate tactics the Darwinian mystics are now employing in dealing with their adversaries."
Darwinist mystics ? You people are funny. If you spent half as much time actually reading what you're arguing against as you do coming up with asinine epithets you might actually get somewhere.
"No longer able to defend their dogma and lacking the intellectual and moral fiber to abandon it, now they can only lash out blindly at those who have always known that there was a purpose in the history of life, a history which I believe is now complete."
So you say. Now prove it.
Ah, John A. Davison. He starts a blog, fills up the comments himself (with some help from his possibly imaginary acolyte VMartin), abandons it and starts another. He's the biggest joke on the internet, and you know what?
I love it so!
...there was a purpose in the history of life...
Yeah, we all know that cute Christian notion that history is "His story". A purpose in life, eh? What was the purpose of the Black Death? Was Europe getting a little too crowded for Jehovah's taste?
"Darwinism is the most failed hypothesis in the history of experimental and descriptive science."
I'll assume that you are using the perjorative 'Darwinism' you mean evolution via natural selection.
Well in that case 'Darwinism' is actually the most succesful hypothesis in the history of experimental and descriptive science. 'Darwinism' describes a vast number of real world systems. Everything from computer systems, to corporations to social structures to *gasp* how and why species change and adapt to their environment.
John, if you want to find some lacking in intellectual and moral fibre look in the mirror.
"
That would be the 19th century, when anthropogenic global warming was still am hypothesis.
I thought that the Theory of Evolution was one of the most proven theories we have. That we find new evidence for it daily.
History won't be complete until the world is at an end, stupid. We're part of the history of the future.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
