Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 458

[After another very specific prediction of the Big Bang theory was confirmed]

i dont see how this proves the big bang,

the scientists could be making wrong conclusions, it could maybe be somthing else,

who am i supposed to believe, scientists who dont know shit compared to God, or God??

Gerrard Pedersen, POD Warrior Forum 12 Comments [9/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 10
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1
Papabear

I have cleaned up the typos in your original message. \"who am i supposed to believe, scientists who know a lot or my imaginary God? I dont know shit.\"

2/25/2006 3:01:37 AM

Crosis

<<< who am i supposed to believe, scientists who dont know shit compared to God, or God?? >>>

Well, seeing as scientists are known to exist and their findings are independently verifiable, and God does not fit either of those descriptions ...

2/25/2006 6:41:40 AM



Wait, wait, wait, I think you got that wrong. It should be:

"Who am I supposed to believe? Scientists who have based their findings on experimentation and solid evidence, or people who thought they heard voices from a giant bearded man in the sky?"

6/6/2010 3:29:13 AM

Canadiest

God's not peer-reviewed, no one speaks for him and the Bible has no answers

6/6/2010 6:59:13 AM

SeekerLancer

Why did God come down and tell you personally or something or are you talking about your minister and the bible which aren't an academic source for anything scientific.

6/6/2010 8:28:41 AM

LordMu

Fundie Thinking: Item #...Oh, who really gives a shit?

9/19/2011 9:08:53 PM

Dr. Shrinker

"who am i supposed to believe, scientists who dont know shit compared to God, or God??"

Who produced the computer you used to write that inane question, scientists or god?

9/20/2011 6:47:10 AM

Anon-e-moose

"who am i supposed to believe, scientists who dont know shit compared to God, or God??"

Care to point out to me in your so-called 'Word of God' the technical specs, construction plans/blueprints & operating manual for the Large Hadron Collider? I mean, theoretical physicists have already figured out the formulae & equations which proves the existence of the Higgs-Boson, thus the LHC merely exists to confirm that model.

...oh yes, that's right. Despite what ancient Greek mathematicians proved - with as near as dammit mathematical precision - before the Bible:



Your 'God' - who claims he knows more than scientists in the 21st Century - thinks that Pi = exactly 3.

Y'know something, God? I'm no scientist, but I reckon you don't know shit compared to me. Even before I went to primary school, I knew that insects had six legs, not four.

9/20/2011 7:26:53 AM

Penzias and Wilson

"who am i supposed to believe ... ??"

We could give a shit.

4/30/2012 4:22:13 PM

Canadiest

Well, No.

So let's get God and the scientists together and finish this.

You don't know if there's a God or know your God. The Bible and the businesses that have grown from it prove NOTHING.

5/1/2012 2:29:33 PM

Quantum Mechanic

And you could not be using a computer.



Really, shit this stupid needs to die.

8/9/2012 5:26:02 PM



it doesnt prove the big bang. It supports the theory of the big bang.

If Big bang is correct we should see X.
Oh look, there is X.

Feel free to submit an alternative theory.

8/9/2012 8:30:25 PM
1