man & man = no babies
woman & woman = no babies
is being a fag ok
HELL FUCKING NOO
IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED GAY
64 comments
Someone forgot adoption and invitro.
Besides, is marriage all about copulation and having kids? If so, you're a sad, sad man.
Homophobes are so stupid, their only argument is "the species would die in the event of an impossible hypothetical situation that will never ever happen!" Yeah, it'd be the end of human kind if everyone turned male, old, into celibate priests, etc. What's your point?
IS EVERY BODY GAY?
HELL FUCKING NOO
SO STFU
There's still enough straight people to keep the human race going, and the market for adoption doesn't need more unwanted kids.
This moronic argument is equivalent to saying 'If everybody was a girl the human race would die out'. But only half of everybody, not accounting for transsexuals, is female, so it's neither valid nor relevant.
If everybody were gay, if all the children were born gay, there are still two options:
1. In-vitro fertilization.
2. Take one for the team.
Who says everyone is turning gay? Look at it this way, having heterosexuals around and accepted and allowed to marry hasn't turned gays straight. Therefore, why in the hell would you think that accepting gays and letting them marry would turn everyone gay?
Or is it that you're tempted, and curious and that bothers you?
man & man = no babies
is being a man ok
HELL FUCKING NOO
IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED MALE
woman & woman = no babies
is being a woman ok
HELL FUCKING NOO
IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED FEMALE
If that ever really happened, like, for some reason, every new person born was gay, then I think we'd notice and take measures to make sure our species doesn't die out. Such as, as others have mentioned, in vitro and "Just Doing It".
But, seeing as how the gay population has been pretty much constant over our history, I think you're just trying to be a fear-monger.
1) Artificial insemination, you idiot.
2) Mankind as a whole isn't suddenly going to become gay. The majority of people are either straight or bisexual, which means that we'll be pumping out plenty of children to overpopulate the planet with for many, many years to come.
IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED GAY
OK, somebody explain this to me nice and slow as if I was a child: How the fuck does that matter?!
If everybody wore snowsuits, a large number of people in hot areas would die.
If everybody went swimming, a large number of people would die from drowning.
If everybody settled in Antarctica, the human race would be in grave jeopardy as Antarctica is incredibly harsh.
Do you view it as immoral to wear a snowsuit, go swimming, or live in Antarctica?
I mean, seriously, how is it possible to be this dumb?
is being a woman ok
HELL FUCKING NOO
IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED FEMALE
BWAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAH!
I gotta steal that one.
Infertile couples can't have babies either. It would be the end of the human kind if everybody was infertile.
What's your point? Since not everyone is gay and not all couples are infertile, there's no problem, right?
WHERE. THE FUCK. DID THIS GOD FORSAKEN "IF EVERYONE TURNED GAY" ARGUMENT COME FROM?! Seriously, do there people even THINK before cranking out these lameass arguments? Are they part of some newsletter?! What? I mean, this is like the tenth post I've seen in two weeks to use this shit!
Well its a good job not everyone is gay then. I think a coupla billion straight people ought to keep the human race alive.
Although looking at your post maybe it would be better if everyone were gay. And forgot about invitro fertilization.
Artifical insemination.
Your move.
If everybody ran themselves over and died, it would be the end of humankind.
...but since the only person dumb enough to do that is you, we seem to be fine.
man & infertility= no babies.
man & porn= no babies.
man & career= no babies.
Conclusion: if everybody turned infertile, watched porn, had a job, watched television, or just spent a good portion of their life doing something aside from penis-in-vagina unprotected sex with the intent of procreation as GOD intended, then civilization as we know it would end INSTANTLY!
GigaGuess wrote:
"WHERE. THE FUCK. DID THIS GOD FORSAKEN "IF EVERYONE TURNED GAY" ARGUMENT COME FROM?!"
He believes that, if homosexuality were accepted, everybody would become gay.
There's only one explanation as to why someone would hold that belief. And it has to do with a certain closet....
"IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED GAY"
The way you repeat this, I think you assign some significance to what is, after all, not rocket science. If everyone was gay, there would be some problems in reproducing, but I think they could have solved it even with 5th century technology, let alone what we have now.
My neighbors are gay. They decided they wanted a kid. They asked a woman they knew well if she minded carrying a baby for them. She said sure, and one of them whacked off into a cup. Nine months later, they had a son to take care of.
So, no. It wouldn't mean no more babies.
actually, if everybody turned gay somehow we'd have a sort of society where people only had children specifically when they wanted to have them with no chance of accidental or unwanted children. It would be excellent for population control ans as out inflated population affects many areas of society it would solve several problems. Too bad its impossible.
Following your logic it would be the end of humankind if everybody chose to be sterile, priest, nun, married over 50................
IT WOULD BE THE END OF HUMAN KIND IF EVERY BODY TURNED GAY
How about we extend on this a bit?
If everyone were sterile, then humankind would die out, therefore people who are sterile is wrong.
If everyone were celibate, then humankind would die out, therefore people who are celibate is wrong.
If everyone were (fe)male, then humankind would die out, therefore being (fe)male is wrong.
Well, that sure is an airtight argument. How about we try again.
@ tracer --
I've heard some absolutely hilarious glass-closet rants from fundies. One popular (and formerly somewhat talented) fundie Mormon sci-fi writer wrote whole articles about how of course every man would find the thought of sex with another man more appealing (because other men would know best how to please a man, natch), but that most men make the noble and self-sacrificing decision to deny some of their own pleasure by having sex with women instead. (And I'm only slightly exaggerating, here.)
Now, all of my knowledge of heterosexuality may be second-hand, but I'm pretty sure that that's not how it works .
is being a fireman ok
HELL FUCKING NOO
IF EVERYONE WERE FIREFIGHTERS THERE WOULD BE NO DOCTORS, POLICEMEN, CONSTRUCTION WORKERS, LAWYERS, ETC.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.