Humans have desires. Wait, to keep it a bit simpler, I'll use men. Men desire various things, not all shared, and not all clearly understood how such desires come about. Some desire feet, legs, pantyhose, SPANDEX, lips, balloons, tongues, boobs, diapers, bondage, condoms, fingernails, underage children, vagina's and yes, penis (etc...). The point is, homosexuality is a developed fetish lumped in with the rest. If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality
61 comments
"Wait, to keep it a bit simpler, I'll use men."
Closet homosexual in the house, people.
If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality.
Well duh. What's your point?
How does that make homosexuality different than heterosexuality? You say gay guys just have penis fetishes, but you also implied straight guys just have boob and vagina fetishes.
That is the bizarrest argument I've ever seen.
"The point is, homosexuality is a developed fetish lumped in with the rest."
W-R-O-N-G.
Not much else to say.
"If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality."
Uh, ok. Sure. I guess. Or not. I don't know what the hell you're trying to get at.
Balloons? o_O
Goes to check the DSM...
And if women didn't have vaginas...
And boobs...
And...
Wait, hang on, I lost track of something.
And yes, there are balloon fetishes.
There's also vore and a number of other things.
I believe it's called Rule 34.
Wait a second. FSTDT.. and Rule 34..
MY FSM! I HAVE TO GO! BRB
"If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality"
AAAAAAAND the human race...
You forgot vore, guro, fursuiting, inflation, toddlercon, etc...
Some desire feet, legs, pantyhose, SPANDEX, lips, balloons, tongues, boobs, diapers, bondage, condoms, fingernails, underage children, vagina's and yes, penis (etc...).
I love the way he slipped pedophilia in there like it wouldn't go unnoticed.
If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality
If a guy didn't have a penis, then there would be no men having sex. Period.
"If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality."
Actually, he'd be a lesbian. :)
Um, if men didn't have penises, they'd be women. Homosexuality isn't a fetish, any more than hetero vaginal intercourse is a fetish.
"If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality"
That would probably put a damper on heterosexuality too.
"If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality"
Well, about 50% of it anyway.
ummm.... yes?
...Only one I have never heard of in that list is fingernails, and what and what about peeing, furry, smoking, pregnent, shemale, scat, shower and lunch to name just a few more.
Okay, rather oddly, several comments on this thread have said something to the effect of 'if men didn't have penises, they'd be women.' That is some seriously fucked up logic, the one that goes 'female is defective male' and raises circumcision accidents as girls.
Not having a penis doesn't make you a woman. Women have actual organs and physical characteristics that distinguish them. A man without a penis is a man with excretory and sexual problems in his future. He is to be pitied. He is not a woman.
Two paragraphs is a little obsessive of me, yes, but that attitude pisses me the hell off, especially from people who consider themselves enlightened and broad-minded.
If a guy didn't have a penis, there would be a cease and desist on MOST homosexuality
Ummm... because men without penises would crave women, instead of men, with a passion, right?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
