The only evidence of evolution is basically within species. Apes or ape-like creatures did not become men. There is no evidence for that. Check out the "scientific" ages of various prehistoric men or pre-men, those ages demonstrate that the evolution of man is at this point ludicrous. I am saying look at evolutionists own dating and you will see there is no sign of evolution in mankind.
Christians do believe in 'cavemen', Troglodytes are apparently such and are in the Bible. They were 100% human, but they had lost significant civilization techniques as well as technology.
30 comments
Troglodytes still live in France, in houses carved out of the very rock. Of course, being French, being 100% human is debatable ;)
Troglodytes are apparently such and are in the Bible. They were 100% human, but they had lost significant civilization techniques as well as technology.
So these "Troglodytes" existed alongside these "advanced people" without reaping the benefits of the civilization and technologies of the day?
I for one find that hard to belive. After all you "Troglodytes" live alongside "advanced people" (i.e. Us) but you do take advantage of our civilization and technologies in spite of the fact that you wish to drag us all back into the dark ages
I am saying look at evolutionists own dating and you will see there is no sign of evolution in mankind.
You don't even know what your talking about, do you?
Check out the "scientific" ages of various prehistoric men or pre-men, those ages demonstrate that the evolution of man is at this point ludicrous
You don't even know what your talking about, do you?
The only evidence of evolution is basically within species. Apes or ape-like creatures did not become men. There is no evidence for that.
Do you mean besides all the evidence that does support it?
He's basically saying, "Reality is not acceptable to me. You must go look at your own evidence and interpret it as the opposite of what it shows, because I won't accept what it does show."
Man, that's got to be the laziest insane argumentation I've ever seen. At least Kent Hovind and Ken Ham attempt to come up with some colorful lies in place of the facts!
~David D.G.
There is no mention od troglodytes nor cavemen in the Bible, you looney turd.
There is, however, plenty of evidence showing the evolution of human beings.
"Check out the "scientific" ages of various prehistoric men or pre-men, those ages demonstrate that the evolution of man is at this point ludicrous. I am saying look at evolutionists own dating and you will see there is no sign of evolution in mankind."
image
What was that again?
Umm, Modern humans are the 'ape like creatures' that evolved to become Homosapiens.
Technology? Back then??? What, digging a hole for a bathroom? Using fire? Flint knives?
*falls out of her chair laughing*
Translation: La, la, la, la, la! I can't hear you!!!
I am saying look at evolutionists own dating and you will see there is no sign of evolution in mankind.
Actually, if we remove your family from the sample, evolution is apparent.
"I am saying look at evolutionists own dating and you will see there is no sign of evolution in mankind."
Because you think the evolution says there was a stately ladder leading from ape to man, hence there should be a rigid linear progression from one ancient hominid to the next with no overlap.
Unfortunately, evolution doesn't plan ahead, so tends not to steer straight, narrow courses from A to B. Instead we get multiple populations growing, thriving and changing alongside one another. Eventually one came to dominate and all others disappeared.
image
The 'ladder of creation' from so-called lower life-forms to the pinnacle of man is a Christian fancy long since discarded by science.
@ myheadhurts:
Allow me to correct your valiant attempt at articulate mud-slinging:
@ 694294: Vous êtes un idiot.
et à Paul M: Les hommes des cavernes avaient une bonne excuse pour leur retard en sciences, mais vous n'êtes que stupide.
You must admit folks have been saying mean things about strangers for a heck of a long time, and will be doing so for a while still.
Take syphilis. During the Renaissance, the French called it le mal italien (the Italian illness), and the Italians called it... 'the French illness'. French and English exhibit the same reciprocal high regard with the parallel expressions filer à l'anglaise and 'to take French leave'.
The more things change...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.