Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 46209

I believe in evolution to a certain extent. I read all the theories of Darwin, and I have come to the conclusion that in the beginning of time there was one fish, one bird, one reptile, one bear, on feline, etc. which evolved into the many fish/birds/reptiles we have today, for this there is overwhelming evidence. However, there is no valid proof that fish evolved into horses and what not! Even if we did evolve from one common ancestor who created him? All the experiments of how a cell could have formed on the prehistoric each have been proved to have faulty chemicals. For example the leading experiment, which supposedly proves how life began, is the Miller and Urey experiment, however scientists have proven that the original simulations of earth atmosphere were not accurate! As for the statement that man and every other creature have evolved over time from one common ancestor has no real leading evidence. Basically scientists argue this point with to points, the fossil record and homologous body structures. However, the fossil record is incomplete and there are no real ape/human fossils. As for the homologous body structure scientist simply look at the bones in birds and try to locate similar bones in alligators. I do not think that these are very valid pieces of evidence. In fact Darwin himself manufactured one of the ape/human fossils and tried to pass it of as a fossil. I believe in Christianity because I read the Case for Christ, which backs up the claims to Christianity with logic and evidence! I suggest buying the teen edition for whoever is interested it’s about 100 pages and it’s a quick read.

pasadena babe, Gaia Online 38 Comments [8/30/2008 6:58:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Fishcakes
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
LOLWUT

That's one large paragraph of failure.

8/30/2008 7:00:08 AM



One? Just one of each? So they reproduced...how?

I think my brain just short-circuited.

8/30/2008 7:02:47 AM

SurfinSeaOtter

Darwin's theories are a little outdated... unlike the bronze age book you all jerk off to, scientific theories change over time. You might say they.... evolve? :P

8/30/2008 7:06:29 AM

Jay-Sus

Bears evolve into horses than de-evolve into cats?

EVOLUTION DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!

8/30/2008 7:09:03 AM

The Outsider

Gaia Online: Still the stupidest place on the internet.

8/30/2008 7:24:19 AM

werewolf

This one rides the short bus.

8/30/2008 7:25:20 AM

JonathanE

"I read all the theories of Darwin"

I call bullshit on this one. Bimbo can't even recall the titles, The Descent of Man and On the Origin of Species.

"I read the Case for Christ, which backs up the claims to Christianity with logic and evidence! I suggest buying the teen edition for whoever is interested it’s about 100 pages and it’s a quick read."

I'll just bet it's a "quick read", you can only say God did it in so many ways, with a few, "it's only a theory"'s thrown in for good measure.

Perhaps, that is what is wrong with you. You gave your sacred book, your bible, a "quick read", or do they make Cliff's Notes for it?

So much stupid in such few words. Amazing, bravo!

8/30/2008 7:32:39 AM

vampirehummingbird

Okay, Pasadena Babes can be stupid, but they're usually a good fuck.

8/30/2008 7:37:53 AM

Dark_Lord_Prime

"As for the homologous body structure scientist simply look at the bones in birds and try to locate similar bones in alligators."

Nobody, including scientists, has to "try" to locate similarities between the skeletons of different species.

They're all blindingly obvious to anyone who isn't trying desperately to justify the insane ramblings of their holy book and its warped descriptions of reality.

8/30/2008 8:22:48 AM



What is it with "the fossil record is incomplete" argument? It makes very little sense.

Transitionary periods between species are short on computer simulations.

They are short in reality (or this can be presumed from the statement above, unless all computer scientists are godless devils who hate christianity)

Very few animals are buried in fossils.

We do have SOME transitionary fossils.

I do not see how this means that they are incomplete.

8/30/2008 9:06:50 AM

Lulzmonger

Gaia Online.

For fucks sake, whenever I see that piece of shit I tend to go onto a beserk.

Sticking it to the man, one denial of service at the time..

8/30/2008 9:12:41 AM



Would you like to meet my good friend Autralopithecus Afarensis?

8/30/2008 9:13:56 AM

werewolf

They reproduced by fission? Like amoeba? Cool.

8/30/2008 10:07:25 AM

Fishcakes

I swear, not all of the Gaia members are this dumb. Just a whole hell of a lot of them.

(I'm on it for the cute pixellated dress-up games.)

8/30/2008 10:24:12 AM

Nirjuana

In the beginning there were prokaryotes, simple bacteria.

8/30/2008 10:25:12 AM

Illuminatalie

Lying for Jesus award.

"I read all the theories of Darwin"
You might have read THE WORDS "theories of Darwin". Once.

8/30/2008 11:33:35 AM

Firthy2002

LOL we've expanded on the ToE since Darwin...

8/30/2008 11:47:07 AM

Brain_In_A_Jar

For example the leading experiment, which supposedly proves how life began, is the Miller and Urey experiment, however scientists have proven that the original simulations of earth atmosphere were not accurate!

So, an experiment proves that the building blocks of proteins can and do arise from a soup of far simpler, inorganic chemicals when exposed to random electrical discharges and heat, and you argue that such a thing couldn't have happened to create us because the soup on primordial earth wasn't exactly the same as that one? You are technically correct, but you're on very shaky ground. It would be like arguing that there was still no proof that man could ever fly in space immediately after Sputnik 5 had returned safely - sure, no proof yet, but a fuckload of very suggestive evidence.

Besides, I seem to recall that further experiments have been carried out since Miller-Urey on the same principles but with a more accurate precursor mix, so you're still out of date, even if you're more informed than the average drooling creationist in even knowing about the existence of that one.

8/30/2008 12:02:43 PM

aaa

Gaia, the most fucked up forum in the internet.

8/30/2008 12:51:04 PM

anevilmeme

"In fact Darwin himself manufactured one of the ape/human fossils and tried to pass it off as a fossil."

Remember, liars burn in hell.

8/30/2008 1:24:53 PM

Philbert McAdamia

the Miller and Urey experiment,

I'm more intensely involved in the Miller-Lite studies, myself *b e l c h h h* excuse moi.

8/30/2008 2:09:26 PM

Mister Spak

"Even if we did evolve from one common ancestor who created him? "

Who created god?

"However, the fossil record is incomplete and there are no real ape/human fossils."

We have the real ape/human fossils. We win.

"In fact Darwin himself manufactured one of the ape/human fossils and tried to pass it of as a fossil"

You creationists manufactured facts to support your lies, including the claim that Darwin manufactured fossils. You lose.

8/30/2008 2:11:22 PM

Canadiest

Most scientists agree that conditions on earth simply WILL create life. Therefore there is no longer many looking for that beginning.


8/30/2008 2:13:04 PM



How many times must it be said that huge groups of organisms evolve not individuals?

8/30/2008 2:41:48 PM



They have no evidence? Lets assume for a moment they don't.

Okay, now show me your evidence.

What do you mean you don't have any?

8/30/2008 2:51:49 PM
1 2