This is the problem with your logic. I have presented evidence to the contrary yet your mind is still set.
1. No dating method has ever worked. Carbon dating, potassium dating, geologic columns, have all been proven wrong. They do not work on things that have a known age, yet scientist claim (with no actual evidence or way to back it up) that the dating methods DO work on things that have unknown ages. If you believe that, fine. But it's faith, not science. If something is proven to be wrong, you can't say it's right.
2. There is nothing without life that can produce life. Feel free to prove me wrong, but you cannot. We have never seen a rock turn into a dog. This is what evolution and big bang theory clearly rely on but that cannot be done.
3. No form of evolution has EVER been observed except for micro-evolution which is the variation within a kind, which as I've said before, is also stated in the Bible. Scientists have only observed that and that has been known since the Bible was written. Scientists try to lump all other forms of evolution in with micro evolution, but it doesn't work that way. If you want there to be macro-evolution, you need to prove it. So far there has been no proof. If you read through this thread carefully, people have brought up all the major "proofs" that scientists have told them, and I've explained how the evidence is incorrect and is all a product of micro-evolution, nothing else.
Those are the 3 biggest debunks of evolution that I've seen although there are many many more problems and flaws in it. If you want to believe it, go right for it, but you cannot call it fact or common knowledge. It doesn't work that way, if it isn't proven right, and all the testing methods are being proven wrong, then at best it's faith.
Watertarg, WoW offtopic 11 Comments
[8/31/2008 7:02:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Worldsend