"Why do people reject documented/recorded facts to follow what can not be proven?"
*cough*Religion*cough*
"A good example of this is dinosaurs."
Dinosaurs are undocumented? Someone should tell all those museums around the world about this.
"There has been, and still are, paintings and carvings of humans and dinosaurs together, but people reject these and keep saying that dinosaurs dies 65 million years ago."
Point to one. The oldest cave paintings in the world are in France and date to, if I recall correctly, about 15,000 years ago. Guess what, no dinosaurs are shown.
"There was no one there to see it, and there is no way to test it."
What is it with you people that think you have to directly observe something in order for anything about it to be known?
"The known dating methods have been proven wrong in EVERY test I have ever heard of were the date was already known, accepted despite a 100% failure,"
You seem confused. The accuracy is generally around 100% assuming the test is done properly, calibrated correctly and you're doing the test on something testable that's within the dating range of the method you've chosen.
"and despite the FACT that there is proof of dinosaurs in the past 1,000 years India, 200 years in North America, and even some siting of dinosaurs STILL alive in the swamp in Africa, the forests of South America, and people who have seen the Locc ness monster claim that it is a dinosaur."
Show me a picture. No, not a blurry "could be anything" picture either. I want a real hi-res, digital photograph of a living dinosaur.
I want it mostly because it would be kind of cool to see, not because it would make a damned bit of difference if one or more actually did still exist. There have been a number of species thought to have been extinct for several million years that have been found.
