I have researched evolution. And it is completely ignorant. It doesn't add up either. Face it, fish can't give birth to monkeys, and a cat can change its size, color and shape, but it can't become a dog.
80 comments
"Face it, fish can't give birth to monkeys, and a cat can change its size, color and shape, but it can't become a dog. "
Well, while that is all completely correct (well, other than a cat changing its size, color and shape), you clearly have not done any real research at all.
"I have researched-"
No you haven't. You haven't researched Evolution, Theology, Logic, Debating or even the basic ability to understand things.
Face it, fish can't give birth to monkeys, and a cat can change its size, color and shape, but it can't become a dog.
You're right, but what does any of this have to do with evolution?
A cat's kittens can be different from their parents through selective breeding. Darwin knew this, and if variationthrough man-made selection was not only possible, but real, then so was variation by means of natural selection. Natural selection, of course takes much longer than creating a new breed of cat or dog.
Evolution doesn't work that way.
Oh, if I told you I thought existence into existence, would ya believe that?
"a cat can change its size, color and shape"
How in holy fuck can you do exactly what you accuse the other side of, which is talk about things that they haven't directly observed. You have so much LESS to base your opinion on. They can point to a a vast body of evidence, you can't even point to your bible to back this up. You can only point to yourself and say "Me God. You listen".
Reading your bible and listening to your pastor is not research.
Can't you go read a basic biology textbook before you spout this nonsense? Pay close attention to the taxonomy and classification of organisms.
"I have researched evolution."
"fish can't give birth to monkeys, and a cat can change its size, color and shape, but it can't become a dog."
So you have done the research then.
A++++
Claims to have done research, then makes ridiculous claims about the subject that would be impossible for a well educated person to seriously postulate.
Same old song and dance, really.
"I have researched evolution."
We're not convinced of that.
"And it is completely ignorant."
You're not convincing us.
"Face it, fish can't give birth to monkeys, and a cat can change its size, color and shape, but it can't become a dog."
Yeah, sure you researched it.
Actually, hyenas evolved from the same ancestor as dogs, but by sharing the same ecological niche as the large cats, they have become more cat-like.
Care to enlighten us with your sources?
Other than the Bible, Kent Hovind, Ken Ham and other universally recognised scientific authorities, that is, peer-reviewed research?
Aside from your first sentence, this is all true.
It is also completely irrelevant, as nowhere in evolutionary theory to any of the things you've listed occur.
Doesn´t sound like you really researched evolution, else you would know that evolution doesn´t claim that a fish might give birth to a monkey.
Researching evolution doesn´t mean reading texts by Horvind on this topic, you know ;)
It means long years of studying the topic (which includes reading scientific texts [which is nothing that Horvind produces]) and maybe doing scientific experiments on your own ;)
Face it, fish can't give birth to monkeys
I have faced it, and it doesn't seem germane* to the discussion. The fact that you are a fucking moron certainly is, though.
* look it up, fundie cunt.
If you really want to research evolution please read Richard Dawkins' The Selfish Gene. If you have any level fo fucntional IQ there is no way you could read that book and walk away still convinced that evolution "doesn't add up".
I can't imagine what research this person did if their understanding of evolution is that we believe that at some point in the past a fish gave birth to a monkey.
... fish can't give birth to monkeys, and a cat ... can't become a dog.
Oh, shit! We never thought of that.
Reading the works of Ham and Hovind does not count as researching evolution. A good starting point for researching evolution would be to find out the basics, of which a?a??a is obviously ignorant. S/he just knows a few strawmen.
Evolution does not claim any creature morphs into something else. But monkeys distant ancestors were fish, and cats and dogs do share a common ancestor.
Indeed, fish can not give birth to monkeys. Slowly evolving into amphibians over hundreds of generations, however, is quite possible.
liar liar pants on fire
"I have researched evolution" indeed :p
This person is either a: a liar or b: a retard.
I think option "a" in this case, because if he really had studied evolution, and come to the conclusions that he did, he cant have had the brainpower to read or write sentences in the first place.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.