Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 48274

They had a bust here not to long ago that netted 40 black street whores..and outta the 40 37 tested positive for aids!They're wiping their own selves out with their animalistic behavior and its predicted that in 30 years that 2/3 of the black race will have fallen to this disease.very promising news...i just hope the beaner numbers escalate as well.14/88

aleister bates, ANSWP forums 27 Comments [9/24/2008 10:10:46 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Damned at Random
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
Rallymodeller

[citation needed]

9/24/2008 10:46:02 PM

88\_NotC_/88

Go out to a major city after midnight if you want a bloody citation. Negroes have been fucking up society after bleeding ball liberals decided to remove their shackles.

Fuck Abraham Lincoln, liberal traitor.

9/24/2008 11:24:30 PM

Will Derrickson

AMen!!!!

9/25/2008 12:19:01 AM

Mindless Rambler

@ 88\_NotC_/88

From the 1830's to the 1850's Abraham Lincoln was a member of the Whig Party, the opposite of the Democrats. He joined the Republican Party after that and never freed any slaves during his presidency. The man was hardly a liberal.

Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson, now those were liberals.

It's called l2history dumbass.

9/25/2008 1:10:25 AM

Red Dragon Disciple

It could not be because they are hookers?

9/25/2008 1:10:34 AM

Mortok

Funny, despite all that, I'm still inclined to give the black sex workers more respect than you.

9/25/2008 3:15:25 AM

Bigot

Thomas Jefferson was a white nationalist:

"The bill on the subject of slaves was a mere digest of the existing laws respecting them, without any intimation of a plan for a future & general emancipation. It was thought better that this should be kept back, and attempted only by way of amendment whenever the bill should be brought on. The principles of the amendment however were agreed on, that is to say, the freedom of all born after a certain day, and deportation at a proper age. But it was found that the public mind would not yet bear the proposition, nor will it bear it even at this day. Yet the day is not distant when it must bear and adopt it, or worse will follow. Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree as that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be pari passu filled up by free white laborers. If on the contrary it is left to force itself on, human nature must shudder at the prospect held up. We should in vain look for an example in the Spanish deportation or deletion of the Moors. This precedent would fall far short of our case."

Source

9/25/2008 3:30:45 PM



@88\_NotC_/88: And yet many Americans consider him to be one of the best, if not the best, presidents that this country has ever had. Are they "liberal traitors" too?

And newsflash, whites have been responsible for most of the violence in this country since this country's founding. It was whites who slaughtered the Native Americans and stole their land, it was whites who enslaved and beat Africans and violently quelled slave rebellions, it was whites who comprised the KKK, one of the most vicious terrorist groups that this country has ever had. It was whites who fought a war against Mexico for the sole purpose of gaining its territories, it was whites who instigated riots against European immigrant groups and blacks, and it was whites who damaged and destroyed Asian-Americans' property during and after WWII. And it is mainly whites who have been assaulting and threatening Arab-Americans after 9/11. If you ask me, whites have been the ones messing up civilized society as we know it by refusing to play nice with their neighbors.

9/25/2008 3:41:42 PM

aaa

I give more respect to hookers than you.

9/25/2008 4:02:16 PM

J. Random Lurker

Citation Really Fucking Needed...

Assuming this is in fact true, then let's see the stats on the prostitutes of other races, as well as the stats on other STIs. And if 37 of the 40 African-American prostitutes had HIV, that in itself doesn't prove that all African-Americans are animalistic.

Not to mention that in a rather oblique sense, we're all African-Americans as the human species itself came out of Africa.

And considering that prostitutes engage in a risky line of work as it is and 48 of the 50 states make the act of prostitution illegal statewide, chances are excellent that your run-of-the-mill streetwalker's carrying something.

*sigh*

Why do I fucking bother? These racist goons are too stupid and too pig-headed to realise their own folly.

9/25/2008 5:53:42 PM

Falyne

*facepalm*

Oh for fuck's sake....

Go AWAY, you moronic asswipes!

9/25/2008 8:29:32 PM

IanC

Beaner?

9/25/2008 9:25:11 PM

Falyne

Beaner = slur for Latin@s

Oh, and in case it's not clear, my previous comment was directed at Bigot, 'NotC', and Will. Seriously, learn2decenthumanbeing, or go the hell away.

9/25/2008 9:46:18 PM

Jay-Sus

@NOTC: Abe Lincoln was the first Republican President. You fail at history.

9/26/2008 2:45:43 AM

Adam

THomas Jefferson was a white nationalist in political terms, as were all founding fathers.

He was also a person that believed only the rich or rather people of high class should vote. (Much like all the founding fathers)

The Founding Fathers lacked the foresight to see a negro beyond being nothing more than property

My question is? What's your point Bigot? Jefferson, A SLAVE OWNER, A RACIST!?!

Why you don't say? The man was not infallible.

9/26/2008 3:24:30 AM

M.M.

Jefferson wrote some amazing things but that doesn't mean he was right about everything.

9/26/2008 11:55:40 PM

Mortok

Didn't Jefferson also get "jungle fever"?

9/27/2008 8:54:17 AM

Bigot

Adam: THomas Jefferson was a white nationalist in political terms, as were all founding fathers.

Indeed. The country was founded by and for white people.

He was also a person that believed only the rich or rather people of high class should vote. (Much like all the founding fathers)

According to?

The Founding Fathers lacked the foresight to see a negro beyond being nothing more than property

Not true, as indicated in the Jefferson quote I provided earlier.

9/27/2008 9:41:52 AM

Romana Twelve

>i just hope the beaner numbers escalate as well.

I find this especially funny, because in the context of that quote, I'm pretty sure he's misusing that word.

Nine out of ten Inigo Montoyas agree: "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

9/27/2008 10:30:27 AM

M.M.

Indeed. The country was founded by and for white people.

You really are the epitome of arrogance, aren't you? It's not so much that I disagree with the comment, it's the fact that you seem to be proud of all this that disgusts me.

9/28/2008 2:23:54 AM

Bigot

There is nothing arrogant in presenting facts where they're absent (this board).

Actually it's pretty arrogant that YOU would "disagree" with the FACT that the country was founded for white people and white people only.

9/28/2008 6:43:04 PM

M.M.

I'm not disagreeing with the FACT that this country was founded by and for white people. Did I not just say that?

I'm talking about YOU and your pride (or hubris, should I say) and how it shows your arrogance. Your pride is selfish, and you are selfish. You think whites are more important than anybody else on the planet, when they are not. And your self-love of being white has been pushed to the extremes.

Pride used in this way, to me, isn't good. Throughout history it has always led to downfall, in some way. I see no point in being proud of what I have no control over. This is the main reason I cannot identify with White Nationalism.

You can call me whatever you want, but you'll never be able to convince me that you and your pride (in the way you use it) are not arrogant in some form or another.

9/29/2008 6:54:35 AM

The L

I still don't get why the word "beaner" is supposed to be so offensive--and neither do some of my Latino friends. Seriously, if the worst thing you can think of about someone is that he enjoys refried beans now and then, you aren't very good at this whole hate thing.

9/30/2008 3:37:22 PM

Bigot

M.M.: I'm not disagreeing with the FACT that this country was founded by and for white people. Did I not just say that?

Looks like you did. My mistake.

I'm talking about YOU and your pride (or hubris, should I say) and how it shows your arrogance. Your pride is selfish, and you are selfish. You think whites are more important than anybody else on the planet, when they are not. And your self-love of being white has been pushed to the extremes.

What pride? I'm not even proud to be white, and why would I be with the current state of things?

Pride used in this way, to me, isn't good. Throughout history it has always led to downfall, in some way. I see no point in being proud of what I have no control over. This is the main reason I cannot identify with White Nationalism.

"White pride" is not inherent to White Nationalism. I'm actually somewhat alienated from a lot of White Nationalists because, rather than focusing on the present, they tend to romanticize the past.

9/30/2008 7:25:34 PM

M.M.

What pride? I'm not even proud to be white, and why would I be with the current state of things?

Sorry. It's just that usually WNs seem to opening flaunt their pride of being white. And ethnic nationalism is almost always associated with pride.

10/1/2008 1:11:18 AM
1 2