Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In Forums

Quote# 48442

As for evo professors, there are dozens of formal debates between them and creationist scientists on YouTube. In every one of them the creationist destroys the evo. Watch them all & see. I've done it twice myself. It's easy. All one must do is restrict thier discussion to science and not use assumption in their assertions & they stand with egg on their face and nothing to say while being laughed at by the audience. This is because evolutionism is purely assumption, presumption, and speculation.

NephilimFree, YouTube 43 Comments [9/23/2008 10:51:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2
#695525
werewolf

Dreams good, delusions bad. You deluded, nephilimfree.

9/24/2008 2:47:39 AM

#695582
Headache

Thundef00t would like to talk to you, NephilimFree.


9/24/2008 4:05:47 AM

#695669
Rallymodeller

Science.

Is Not.

A Democracy!

9/24/2008 4:56:42 AM

#695735
aaa

No, it's the other way around.

9/24/2008 7:23:58 AM

#695863
Palet_Face

Is it opposite day or something, because I can't think of any instance where a creationist destroys the scientist.

Thunderf00t vs VFX (also known as Posterboy for Creationism).
<insert favourite youtube atheist> vs Kent Hovind, Ken Ham, Ray Comfort, or any other creationist.
Kistzmiller vs Dover.
Christopher Hitchens vs All of Religion.

9/24/2008 11:07:55 AM

#695999
BufferickVonHellbags

notice, also, how these creationists are only concerned with "winning" an argument. i think they're totally missing the point as to why people are researching things like evoltuion in the first place. simply put, biologists, paleontologists, anthropologists, etc. are all simply trying to understand the basic questions of human existence and development. we all have an innate curiosity when it comes to where we, as a species, fit in to the grander scheme of things, i.e. nature and the universe. they're not trying to define or enforce morality. they're not trying to impose any sort of belief on anyone. why can't creationists understand this? just because they have an agenda, doesn't mean scientists do. science is about gathering evidence, creationism is about making the oppostion look stupid to reinforce their own ideals, plain and simple.

9/24/2008 1:49:25 PM

#696057
The L

"All one must do is restrict thier discussion to science and not use assumption in their assertions & they stand with egg on their face and nothing to say while being laughed at by the audience."

Wrong. This is what one must do to prove that creationism isn't science, and that evolution is a valid theory.

9/24/2008 2:29:59 PM

#696136
Safaraz

Is it just me that still laughs when I hear the term "Creationist Scientists"?

9/24/2008 3:41:37 PM

#696149
Navelgazer

NephilimFree....phfft...wimp. Try 2% Nephilim instead. Much less Nephilim per serving but keeps almost all the mythology.

9/24/2008 3:46:33 PM

#696737
Saika

You've been watching the wrong ones.

9/24/2008 10:05:08 PM

#702426


The sad part is this fundie tard made refutes of a refute ExtantDodo did to Kent Hovind. ExtantDodo's video = win. NephilimFree on the other hand is made up of pure lying for Jesus.

9/29/2008 2:17:07 PM

#804857
FSAthe1st

I've made a series dissecting the steaming pile of BS that this fool put out in the first place, and he responded with yet more B/S. By the way, the two he claims to have won debates against are Per Ahlberg and Mark A McPeek. I suspect neither have heard of him.

12/11/2008 1:11:36 AM

#1367607
Quantum Mechanic

Lie much?

1/19/2012 5:14:27 PM

#1367649
Justanotheratheist

The only thing that might be destroyed of the "evos" is some of their faith in human intelligence. Creation science is a wholly fictictious scam, and proper scientists will no more debate it than argue whether the moon is made of rock or of blue cheese.

1/19/2012 11:03:35 PM

#1367663
Swede

Formal debates, on YouTube?

Why didn't you or any of these "creationist scientists" help Michael Behe in the Kitzmiller vs Dover trial, if it's SO easy to refute evolution? Instead you left him to stand "with egg on his face and nothing to say while being laughed at by the audience".

1/20/2012 1:02:58 AM

#1367673
Feral Dog

But Evo is an expensive brand of kibble for cats, dogs and ferrets! What does that have to do with scientific deba- oh, you mean scientists who study evolution. Got it.

1/20/2012 3:48:21 AM

#1367837
Anon-e-moose

"As for evo professors"



...Jeremy Clarkson has two honorary Doctorates in Engineering, and James May is a Doctor of Letters, so yes, one could say they are Professors of the rally-spec Mitsubishi Evo, and I'll just go get my coat, shall I...?!

X3

1/20/2012 9:16:40 AM

#1368224


Its that the scientists play the creation drinking game , and by the time the opening statement is finished they are all plastered.

carbon dating fossils - two drinks
geology shows 6000 years - one drink
irreducible complexity or behe - three drinks
no intermediate fossils - one pint

1/21/2012 9:00:27 PM
1 2