Non-Christian scientists have discovered that every single piece of skeletal evidence for the different stages of man are either fake or incorrect, human footprints have been found right next to and even beneath dinosaur footprints, and the direction of the planets' spin in orbit contradicts the traditional big bang theory. I think secular scientists have done enough to disprove evolution on their own. Thats just the tip of the iceberg!
[She then lists Hovind as her source]
57 comments
:headdesk:
:reaches for cluebat:
"Non-Christian scientists have discovered that every single piece of skeletal evidence for the different stages of man are either fake or incorrect,"
Name the scientists.
"human footprints have been found right next to and even beneath dinosaur footprints,"
Name the location.
"and the direction of the planets' spin in orbit contradicts the traditional big bang theory."
The Big Bang theory says precisely fuck all about the direction a planet should spin.
"I think secular scientists have done enough to disprove evolution on their own."
Really? Where?
I've just been reading a page about quarks. Almost every sentence contained definitions and information about them.
I learned vastly more from the first paragraph (which wasn't a lot) than I did from this paragraph. Some of it I didn't understand, so i followed the references, and started reading about other vast areas of information.
I'll summarise.. Shut the fuck up. you don't know anything. You probably work in a shop, and you've never done any research in your life.
...because planets can only spin in one direction after expanding outwards from a single point?
ps. Evolution =/= Big Bang. They're totally different theories.
pps. Listing Hovind as a source is like saying "This must be true because I found it carved into a doughnut at Tim Hortons."
Non-Christian scientists have discovered that every single piece of skeletal evidence for the different stages of man are either fake or incorrect
Yeah, like take the famous ER1470. It's interpretation as a member of a predecessor species, Homo habilis, is incorrect. It's obviously a modern human (Gish) a modern ape (Gish, later) a modern human (Lubenow). Well, it's one of the two, but it's sure not an intermediate. [/sarcasm]
I read Hovind's so called "PhD dissertation"... What a total joke! It would have gotten an F in 9th grade science class.
The guy is a complete joke, his "PhD" is not worth the price of the paper in his "diploma".
"Non-Christian scientists have discovered that every single piece of skeletal evidence for the different stages of man are either fake or incorrect,"
Christian con men have been lying to you. And you fell for it.
Maybe this is an innocent bystander who got caught in the trap of bad science (ok, so I probably just defiled the word science even though I said it was bad) set out by fakes. I don't think I can blame the person here anymore than I blame a child suicide bomber, both are victims of much greater crimes.
Non-Christian scientists have discovered that every single piece of skeletal evidence for the different stages of man are either fake or incorrect
Not true.
human footprints have been found right next to and even beneath dinosaur footprints
Faked .
the direction of the planets' spin in orbit contradicts the traditional big bang theory
Bull. Fucking. Shit.
That was 100% lie.
Do you always lie?
You cite Kent 'Oh, Mark 12:17 doesn't apply to me!' Hovind as a credible source.
Your argument is invalid. As was his defence in court. Thus is he in receipt of daily arserapings by his cellmate Bubba.
>:D
"and the direction of the planets' spin in orbit contradicts the traditional big bang theory"
Since you obviously know so much about the big bang theory, why don't you explain to us exactly what the big bang theory says. Then you can tell us how and where the big bang theory predicts planet rotation, and why that prediction contradicts what we see in our solar system.
Don't be afraid to get too detailed.
Hovind as a source? Source for idiocy, lies, and denigration of science, that I'd agree with.
"Thats just the tip of the iceberg! "
Yeah, the giant iceberg of stupidity.
Ok. For sake of argument, let's say everything in modern science is wrong. How does that then make your specific creation myth correct and true? You do know that there are thousands of incompatible creation myths, right? How do you know YOURS is the one that is correct and true? Oh, I get it. You "believe" it.
You do know that what you believe has no bearing on what's actually true, right? You can test this by experiment. Try not believing in gravity. Then step off a cliff. Let us know how that works out for you.
Their entire argument consists of:
In other news; the sky is olive green, and the sun rises in the North and sets in Nebraska.
You should only use Hovind as a source if your thesis is "How to scam gullible fools, commit tax fraud and get caught".
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
