There is no such thing as an experiment that can test evolution. Why, you ask? Because all experiments can only test intelligent design, because all experiments are designed by our intelligence, period. What do you think of that?
61 comments
A simple experiment using six-sided die can demonstrate how random events lead to normal distributions. Nothing about intelligence in there.
When did you last carry out a scientific experiment, bub?
Intelligent design? 99% of all species that have lived on earth are extinct. That's an example of intelligence?
There is no such thing as an experiment that can test intelligent design, because all experiments can only test evolution, because all experiments are based on science, not mythology, period.
What do you think of that?
Fixed.
I think you've got a serious misunderstanding of evolutionary theory.
Even if you mean abiogenesis, not evolution (yes, they're two different things), you're still wrong and your argument is not new.
[There is no such thing as an experiment that can test evolution.]
Telomeres.
[Why, you ask?]
I don't need to ask. I've seen the results.
[Because all experiments can only test intelligent design, because all experiments are designed by our intelligence, period. What do you think of that?]
I think that you don't know a thing about what you're talking about.
What do you think of that?
You sir, are an idiot of the first order.
From Freboy: "A simple experiment using six-sided die can demonstrate how random events lead to normal distributions. Nothing about intelligence in there."
Someone already made the same comment. He replied that since the dice were intelligently designed, the test tests intelligent design.
Levesque?
So very, very, slippery.
So does that mean we can't, for example, test the existence of the moon either?
Sorry... Moon doesn't exist. We didn't make it, so..
He's saying all experiments can only show how "well-designed" we are to reason and test things.
Which is tautological because it assumes that we're intelligently designed with no other evidence supporting it.
circular reasoning is circular reasoning is circular ...
I think you need to go look up what "intelligent design" actually is supposed to mean, one more time.
I mean it's a really dumb premise but this is even dumber.
This guy himself, is the contraction to the intelligent design.
Fuck, I bet even his cell memory is fucking horrible.
"There is no such thing as an experiment that can test evolution."
Just one name completely annihilates your argument: Richard Lenski.
"Because all experiments can only test intelligent design, because all experiments are designed by our intelligence, period. What do you think of that?"
Just three words completely annihilates so-called (un)'Intelligent Design ', the phrase so beloved of you Cre(a)ti(o)nists: Duck billed Platypus.
What was your 'God' thinking?! And you don't think . Period.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
