Q. If you can find some evidence for an alternative theory (to evolution), I'm all ears. Until then, you don't have a leg to stand on.
A. Ok, my theoruy is that God made it all. The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design. There are NO exceptions. That proves my theory of inteliigent design od all creation. You lose.
Q. So, who designed god? Who designed god's intelligence?
A. No God is not intelligent - He is all knowing. Big difference. There is no physical brain with intelligence to design.
42 comments
"The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design."
OK, so where's the evidence of THAT "evidence?" No fair using the Bible.
[Ok, my theoruy is that God made it all. The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design.
So...you're saying that it takes intelligence to make intelligent design? Brilliant.
[There are NO exceptions.]
Are you sure? Where have you looked?
[That proves my theory of inteliigent design od all creation. You lose.]
Good work. I just have a few more questions:
How do you test your theory?How did he/she/they do it?
[No God is not intelligent - He is all knowing. Big difference. There is no physical brain with intelligence to design.]
Now you're saying God isn't intelligent. Which means that intelligent design is impossible. Which disproves your little "theory". You lose.
The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design. There are NO exceptions.
Snowflakes! BAM! I just shot down your whole premisse!
"The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design.
And yet water vapor can spontaneously form complex, sophisticated and unique snowflakes, no imaginary friend required.
Well if God is not intelligent, then He can't design anything, so I think that about wraps it up.
Evolution stands as the explanation for life. *bangs gavel*
So eiither god didn´t design the universe (as he isn´t intelligent)
If intelligence = no intelligence there is no need for a creator as intelligent design = non intelligent design
Ergo both conclusions that can be drawn from the things you wrote don´t need god or another designer
"The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design."
To fill all three stated criteria, yes. That's like using a word to define itself though. Present your proof that all complex design is "intelligent".
There are NO exceptions.
Because you say so? Ok, I'll play along.
"No God is not intelligent"
Then it can't be your designer, can it?
Why are you so sure you're intelligently designed when so much stupid is going on in there?
"A. Ok, my theoruy is that God made it all. The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design. There are NO exceptions. That proves my theory of inteliigent design od all creation. You lose."
Though biological systems can be complex, I challenge you to show that complex biological systems require intelligent design. Your stating that intelligent design is required, does not show that intelligent design is required. All it shows is that you say so. You lose.
I agree, God is not intelligent as an imaginary being cannot BE intelligent or stupid.
True, knowledge doesn't imply reasoning ability. You're not making a very good case for your God, C2.
Thanks for the word salad, but I'm allergic to it.
A. Ok, my theoruy is that God made it all. The evidence is that it takes intelligence to make complex, sophisticated and intelligent design. There are NO exceptions. That proves my theory of inteliigent design od all creation. You lose.
Now disprove evolution without using the Bible.
So let me get this straight..
...it takes intelligence to intelligently design things. Therefore intelligently designed things are proof of an intelligent designer...
..so where is your proof that this cosmos was intelligently designed? Do you have anything other than your conveniently circular reasoning?
Also, and you evaded this humorously, but isnt your argument suggestive that a god must have a creator, and so on into infinity because a god is so complex and sophisticated?
Im sorry, I must have went over your head..go about your business now..
It's the 'who made god' thing that gives the lie to ID. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that we are the constructions of aliens, however unlikely, but it doesn't *tell* us anything. If intelligence is required, sooner or later you get back to a first cause in the form of a god, who is somehow exempt from the rules.
Would you kindly present us the proof?
And for pity's sake if you try to push bible as evidence, I'm going to pull out that vertebrae out of your fucking nose!
Ok so your "evidence" is that it takes an intelligent being to design complex things. This is not evidence, but a theory for which you have provided no evidence. So that's fail number one. Then, when challenged to explain why does god himself have no creator, you explain that god is not intelligent, contradicting your own theory. So that's fail number two. Finally, since you seem to feel the need to pre-emptively defend this statement from future attack, you support it with the argument that nobody with a physical brain (read: intelligence) can design anything. This of course contradicts evidence we see everyday of things people with brains have designed, but it ALSO contradicts your original theory that it takes intelligence to design. Fail number three.
You've got nested fails.
Even your fails have fails.
Firstly, that's not a theory. Secondly, that's not yours; it was put in your empty head by someone else. Thirdly, "There are NO exceptions" is not proof and you do not define any of your terms.
You are right about God not being intelligent, though. He's kind of a failure.
This joke is too easy, but here we go:
"God is not intelligent."
Well, they do say man created God in his own image...
Get a bunch of marbles, all the same size.
Oops, you've just shot down that "complex design" nonsense, no intelligence required, no god in sight. Now take a couple of chemistry classes, and get back to me.
No God is not intelligent - He is all knowing
His 'Omniscience ' - via his 'True' Bible - says that insects have four legs. I can prove my superior intelligence by the fact I know something he doesn't :
image
Count 'em.
Because if your answer is the only one possible, then you're right:
No GodAs he's purely the invention of Bronze Age goatfuckers with ideas above their stations.
How can he be 'All Knowing': when I know at least one more thing than he does...?!
...at least one thing, did I say? Find in your BuyBull where it says 'Intel i9 CPUs'.
It's okay, I can wait...!
A. No God is not intelligent - He is all knowing. Big difference. There is no physical brain with intelligence to design.
Didn't the Kitzmiller vs Dover try that? They were laughed out of court by the conservative judge.
Why not try to manage spelling "theory" before you try to fabricate one, dearie?
Isn't God a complex, sophisticated and intelligent design? Who created him?
Again, try to spell "intelligent" before you state someone is intelligent.
Od?
Moving the goal posts, I see. Who created the goal posts?
Wait, you just said "it takes intelligence to make intelligent design" and then you say "God is not intelligent".
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
