I'm confused (though not, I suspect, as confused as LaMontre).
By \"condition,\" is he referring to homosexuality itself? Or is he referring to some other condition -- say, that of AIDS?
If the former, his objection is nonsense because if these people are practicing homosexuality, then they indisputably have the \"condition\" of being homosexual, by definition.
If the latter, well, all I can say is that if that were true, a lot of people have been dying of nothing, and have somehow managed to fool a lot of very smart medical researchers into finding the virus that causes it.
1/27/2006 6:47:35 PM