There's no evidence for evolution thats why it is being rejected by most scientists today.
53 comments
"There's no evidence for evolution thats why it is being rejected by most scientists today."
Do you even know what a scientist is? Aside from that, it doesn't much matter what "scientists" think; it only matters what a specific subgroup of scientists, the biologists, say.
I guess he never heard of Project Steve.
From creationist and Fellow of the Discovery Institute, William Dembski, "If Project Steve was meant to show that a considerable majority of the scientific community accepts a naturalistic conception of evolution, then the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) could have saved its energies that fact was never in question ."
I guess Dembski hasn't talked to guys like Death2TheWorld ...
There's no evidence for creation thats why it is being rejected by most scientists today.
Problem solved.
Get your head out your ass, shithead!
Absolutely, D2tW, if one wishes something was true, all one has to do is proclaim it so and it IS immediately so.
In your fantasy world, that's probably true.
By the way, your name doesn't really seem to have been inspired by the teachings of Jesus.
There's no evidence for evolution thats why it is being rejected by most scientists today.
1. Kent Hovind is not a scientist.
2. A creation scientist is not a scientist.
3. Just because someone is a scientist does not make them qualified to comment on the veracity of evolutionary theory. You would need a biologist for that. A physicist or volcanologist speak of evolutionary theory with no more authority that you, me, or the hobo on the street corner.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.