1
#10819
Gadren
Christianity is correct because it's true!
...what a gorram fool.
1/16/2006 6:45:53 PM
#10826
David D.G.
\"The Christian version is the only correct one because it is true and is documented from the very beginning. All other creation stories can't be true if the Christian version is true.\"
------------
Not even the Babylonian one that it's based on? And that one was written earlier than the one in Genesis, so I guess it's even more \"documented from the very beginning\" than Genesis is.
~David D.G.
1/16/2006 7:34:23 PM
#10838
CousinTed
Gadren: Bastard must have da-shiong bao-jah-shr duh la doo-tze in place of his brain.
1/16/2006 8:43:40 PM
#10876
Crosis
I'd call it circular logic, but you actually have to leave the starting point to make it circular. How about \"point logic\"?
1/17/2006 1:46:05 AM
#10945
Rime
W
T
F
?
1/17/2006 4:42:07 PM
#10950
David D.G.
Crosis, that description fits perfectly.
~David D.G.
1/17/2006 5:57:48 PM
#1262705
Samsung R530
This is your best post yet!
3/2/2011 1:20:31 PM
#1262709
Swede
From the very beginning of what? You ARE aware that Judaism is much, much older than Christianity, aren't you? And that Buddhism and Hinduism are even older? Right? Right?
Many of the other creation stories are also older than Christianity. How do you explain them?
They all knew that Christianity was about to emerge, and they wanted to steal its creation story before it surfaced?
3/2/2011 1:39:48 PM
#1262715
Angua
Don't you mean the Jewish version? Or the Jewish/Christian version? You realize that Genesis is a book in the Hebrew Bible too, right?
The Islamic creation story is pretty darned similar. Given that Genesis 1 and 2 contradict each other at several points, why not throw in the Islamic version too? It documents the whole thing "from the very beginning" as well.
For that matter, what creation story is not "documented from the very beginning"? Isn't that the whole point of a creation story?
3/2/2011 1:53:25 PM
#1262761
Canadiest
Which one, first or second?
Yes, it does matter, especially when you're arguing literal truth.
3/2/2011 3:19:49 PM
#1262777
GigaGuess
And it's impossible for the Christian version to be untrue, because that's the one you believe.
Amirite?
3/2/2011 4:10:42 PM
#1262889
Justanotheratheist
Aside from the nonsensical and circular nature of his "argument", I really dig the name of the website where he posted it.
Unfortunately the link is no longer working, because something called "Creation, Dinosaurs and the Flood" can only be a huge belly laugh.
3/3/2011 2:02:37 AM
#1264445
jas43
biblical creation is the biggest laughing stock in the fucking universe.
3/7/2011 6:15:55 PM
#1264927
TWoozl
The circular logic! It WHIRLS!
So, uh. How about those pre-Christian Babylonian myths that were blatantly jacked, eh?
Edit: Spam plow required, Aisle 5 please, Distind!
3/8/2011 5:32:51 PM
#1265403
anti-nonsense
Round and round the logic goes, where it stops nobody knows!
3/9/2011 7:17:30 PM
#1265406
Philbert McAdamia
>> if the Christian version is true. <<
if
3/9/2011 7:20:44 PM
#1265654
3/10/2011 5:23:56 PM
#1266977
Godbuster
So wait... did god have a stenographer that wrote everything he did down?
"Oh, sorry, Jehova, I missed that, can you repeat that?"
"I uuhh... just created the plants."
"Oh, cool, thanks!"
3/14/2011 3:16:07 PM
#1267084
whatever
Sounds reasonable to me.
3/15/2011 5:13:54 AM
#1267190
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
3/15/2011 1:21:43 PM
#1267196
brendand
so close...
3/15/2011 2:01:17 PM
1