Quote# 5080

The Christian version is the only correct one because it is true and is documented from the very beginning. All other creation stories can't be true if the Christian version is true.

Charlie Liebert, Creation, Dinosaurs and the Flood Guestbook 21 Comments [10/1/2003 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

1 | bottom


Christianity is correct because it's true!

...what a gorram fool.

1/16/2006 6:45:53 PM

David D.G.

\"The Christian version is the only correct one because it is true and is documented from the very beginning. All other creation stories can't be true if the Christian version is true.\"


Not even the Babylonian one that it's based on? And that one was written earlier than the one in Genesis, so I guess it's even more \"documented from the very beginning\" than Genesis is.

~David D.G.

1/16/2006 7:34:23 PM


Gadren: Bastard must have da-shiong bao-jah-shr duh la doo-tze in place of his brain.

1/16/2006 8:43:40 PM


I'd call it circular logic, but you actually have to leave the starting point to make it circular. How about \"point logic\"?

1/17/2006 1:46:05 AM



1/17/2006 4:42:07 PM

David D.G.

Crosis, that description fits perfectly.

~David D.G.

1/17/2006 5:57:48 PM

Samsung R530

This is your best post yet!

3/2/2011 1:20:31 PM


From the very beginning of what? You ARE aware that Judaism is much, much older than Christianity, aren't you? And that Buddhism and Hinduism are even older? Right? Right?

Many of the other creation stories are also older than Christianity. How do you explain them?
They all knew that Christianity was about to emerge, and they wanted to steal its creation story before it surfaced?

3/2/2011 1:39:48 PM


Don't you mean the Jewish version? Or the Jewish/Christian version? You realize that Genesis is a book in the Hebrew Bible too, right?

The Islamic creation story is pretty darned similar. Given that Genesis 1 and 2 contradict each other at several points, why not throw in the Islamic version too? It documents the whole thing "from the very beginning" as well.

For that matter, what creation story is not "documented from the very beginning"? Isn't that the whole point of a creation story?

3/2/2011 1:53:25 PM


Which one, first or second?
Yes, it does matter, especially when you're arguing literal truth.

3/2/2011 3:19:49 PM


And it's impossible for the Christian version to be untrue, because that's the one you believe.


3/2/2011 4:10:42 PM


Aside from the nonsensical and circular nature of his "argument", I really dig the name of the website where he posted it.

Unfortunately the link is no longer working, because something called "Creation, Dinosaurs and the Flood" can only be a huge belly laugh.

3/3/2011 2:02:37 AM


biblical creation is the biggest laughing stock in the fucking universe.

3/7/2011 6:15:55 PM


The circular logic! It WHIRLS!

So, uh. How about those pre-Christian Babylonian myths that were blatantly jacked, eh?

Edit: Spam plow required, Aisle 5 please, Distind!

3/8/2011 5:32:51 PM


Round and round the logic goes, where it stops nobody knows!

3/9/2011 7:17:30 PM

Philbert McAdamia

>> if the Christian version is true. <<


3/9/2011 7:20:44 PM


@Justanotheratheist: The guestbook may be gone, but the site is still there. :)


3/10/2011 5:23:56 PM


So wait... did god have a stenographer that wrote everything he did down?

"Oh, sorry, Jehova, I missed that, can you repeat that?"
"I uuhh... just created the plants."
"Oh, cool, thanks!"

3/14/2011 3:16:07 PM


Sounds reasonable to me.

3/15/2011 5:13:54 AM


3/15/2011 1:21:43 PM


so close...

3/15/2011 2:01:17 PM

1 | top: comments page