This is the reason I sometimes feel like advocating forced sterilisation for people under a certain IQ.
11/3/2008 12:26:14 PM
11/3/2008 12:27:10 PM
Jk, that example is not really a good counter argument for the case Selar pathetically is trying to cobble up.
11/3/2008 12:34:57 PM
Maybe I lack Selar's wisdom and understanding of the universe but what the fuck does evolution have to do with same sex marriage?
11/3/2008 12:37:09 PM
I suspect you are often disappointed in your expectations.
11/3/2008 12:42:39 PM
It's a bit sad that the people who think sex is only for procreation are the ones we wish wouldn't procreate.
11/3/2008 12:48:05 PM
11/3/2008 12:53:18 PM
Well, isn't the Y Chromosome unstable anyway?
11/3/2008 12:53:28 PM
CAPS LOCK MAKES YOU LOOK EVEN MORE STUPID THAN YOU ALREADY ARE.
11/3/2008 12:55:20 PM
Neither of these propositions is out of the question. However, it would take eons for men to develop the necessary reproductive organs, and similarly for women to develop the ability to produce sperm to fertilise their own eggs.
The fly in the ointment is that neither would be necessary, since we already have the ability to reproduce in the human environment. Although I must say that it would be good if some people couldn't.
Evolution happpens when it needs to, not when somebody wants it to.
11/3/2008 12:56:44 PM
actually could care less. However for those who believe in evolution If same sex marriage was to be.. THEN I EXPECT EVOLUTION TO START CONVERTING MEN TO MAKE AND HAVE CHILDREN WITH EACH OTHER, I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN. I MEAN HUMANS NOT ANIMALS
I have a couple of friends who would like to comment on your post and on you personally.
(By the way, you're thicker than a whale omlette.)
11/3/2008 12:57:17 PM
I'm not sure where the connection between evolution and homosexuality comes in.
11/3/2008 1:00:10 PM
Someoone explain to Selar what selection pressures are.
11/3/2008 1:16:57 PM
Sounds like Biology either didn´t belong to your education at school, or you slept during the lessons (or, even worse, you were homeschooled by fundamentalist parents ;) )
11/3/2008 1:32:22 PM
Is this because of some form of retardation?
11/3/2008 1:40:00 PM
Humans not animals? You stupid.
What part of takes millions of years do they not understand? Oh, right: they think everything should happen in six days.
11/3/2008 1:40:37 PM
"THEN I EXPECT EVOLUTION TO START CONVERTING MEN TO MAKE AND HAVE CHILDREN WITH EACH OTHER, I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN."
"I MEAN HUMANS NOT ANIMALS"
11/3/2008 1:45:20 PM
A better evolutionary purpose for homosexuality would be population control, IMHO.
11/3/2008 1:45:32 PM
I expect gumdrops and candy canes to rain from the sky today at precisely 3:28 pm, doesn't mean it's going to happen.
11/3/2008 2:21:25 PM
Your expectations are retarded.
11/3/2008 2:34:46 PM
Rat of Steel
"Maybe I lack Selar's wisdom and understanding of the universe but what the fuck does evolution have to do with same sex marriage?"
Ignoring Selar's mistaken assertion that humans aren't animals (What could they be, I wonder? Vegetables? Minerals?), I think the case s/he is trying to make is:
"Marriage is all about begetting and raising children. If you godless heathens are so sure that same-sex marriage is right and natural, why hasn't your precious evolution gone ahead and made it possible for men to have kids with men, or women with women? Oh, that's right. It can't happen that way; therefore, same-sex marriage isn't natural, and therefore is wrong and shouldn't be allowed."
I've never really comprehended the confusion of ideas that makes it possible for fundies to say much of what they say, but in this case, I think I've got it pretty close to the mark, anevilmeme.
11/3/2008 2:36:32 PM
Wow. Evolution has nothing to do with same sex marriage, unless of course same-sex couples assist the community or what not to be more successful (as the case in some organisms).
Plus we'd be overpopulated if everyone mated, and no one wants that. Think rush hour traffic.
11/3/2008 2:38:17 PM
You leave my unstable Y chromosomes alone Selar!
11/3/2008 2:44:10 PM
If men "evolved" so that they could reproduce with each other, by definition one of them would become a woman, jackass.
Zoologically speaking males have sex cells that are small and mobile, females have sex cells that are relatively large and stationary. This is what defines male and female.
11/3/2008 2:47:19 PM
No thanks, I've had enough word salad today.
11/3/2008 2:51:48 PM