actually could care less. However for those who believe in evolution If same sex marriage was to be.. THEN I EXPECT EVOLUTION TO START CONVERTING MEN TO MAKE AND HAVE CHILDREN WITH EACH OTHER, I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN. I MEAN HUMANS NOT ANIMALS
50 comments
Neither of these propositions is out of the question. However, it would take eons for men to develop the necessary reproductive organs, and similarly for women to develop the ability to produce sperm to fertilise their own eggs.
The fly in the ointment is that neither would be necessary, since we already have the ability to reproduce in the human environment. Although I must say that it would be good if some people couldn't.
Evolution happpens when it needs to, not when somebody wants it to.
fergus
actually could care less. However for those who believe in evolution If same sex marriage was to be.. THEN I EXPECT EVOLUTION TO START CONVERTING MEN TO MAKE AND HAVE CHILDREN WITH EACH OTHER, I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN. I MEAN HUMANS NOT ANIMALS
I have a couple of friends who would like to comment on your post and on you personally.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zXp6qv299lk
Sounds like Biology either didn´t belong to your education at school, or you slept during the lessons (or, even worse, you were homeschooled by fundamentalist parents ;) )
Humans not animals? You stupid.
What part of takes millions of years do they not understand? Oh, right: they think everything should happen in six days.
"THEN I EXPECT EVOLUTION TO START CONVERTING MEN TO MAKE AND HAVE CHILDREN WITH EACH OTHER, I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN."
Why?
"I MEAN HUMANS NOT ANIMALS"
What?
(anevilmeme)
Ignoring Selar's mistaken assertion that humans aren't animals (What could they be, I wonder? Vegetables? Minerals?), I think the case s/he is trying to make is:
"Marriage is all about begetting and raising children. If you godless heathens are so sure that same-sex marriage is right and natural, why hasn't your precious evolution gone ahead and made it possible for men to have kids with men, or women with women? Oh, that's right. It can't happen that way; therefore, same-sex marriage isn't natural, and therefore is wrong and shouldn't be allowed."
I've never really comprehended the confusion of ideas that makes it possible for fundies to say much of what they say, but in this case, I think I've got it pretty close to the mark, anevilmeme.
Wow. Evolution has nothing to do with same sex marriage, unless of course same-sex couples assist the community or what not to be more successful (as the case in some organisms).
Plus we'd be overpopulated if everyone mated, and no one wants that. Think rush hour traffic.
If men "evolved" so that they could reproduce with each other, by definition one of them would become a woman, jackass.
Zoologically speaking males have sex cells that are small and mobile, females have sex cells that are relatively large and stationary. This is what defines male and female.
Douchebag.
Sex works because heterosexual people exist. Humans are a family species that lives in groups. All the members do not need to breed for the group to persist.
A gay man (or woman) is no more or no less a contributor to the evolutionary fitness and provision of the next generation and it's progeny than your priests, monks and nuns...
If you "actually could care less" (which, I assume, in your illiterate vernacular means "actually couldn't care less"), why did you descend into an all-caps rant?
Schizo much?
Same sex marriage doesn't increase the number of homosexuals; it just gives them legal rights. Evolution almost never does what we "expect", because we rarely have all the details. For example, if male homosexuality were caused by something on the X chromosome, it might reduce the survival of males but increase the survival of females.
I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN.
This could probably be done now in a laboratory.
This idiot doesn't even understand the meaning of gender in the first place.
That said, human parthenogenesis experiments are underway in many laboratories. Selar should be careful what he wishes for.
You realize, don't you, that over 90% of the population isn't attracted to the same sex? They're perfectly capable of producing the next generation of babies themselves.
Or are you of the opinion that if same-sex marriage is legalized, then everyone is going to want one?
actually could care less. However for those who believe in evolution If Catholicism was to be.. THEN I EXPECT EVOLUTION TO START CONVERTING CATHOLIC PRIESTS TO MAKE AND HAVE CHILDREN WITH THEIR ALTAR BOYS, I ALSO EXPECT NUNS WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN. I MEAN HUMANS NOT ANIMALS
Because evolution can happen without offspring being produced. Oh, and it has to be legal first.
You can't evolve if you're not married. That's why the dinosaurs died out.
Evolution and genetics do not "know" what marriage is. Marriage is a man-made concept and practice that has nothing whatsoever to do with nature.
The fact that I had to write this in explanation to (what I assume is) an adult is disturbing.
"I ALSO EXPECT WOMEN WITHOUT THE AID OF MALE SPERM TO PRODUCE CHILDREN"
Actually, science has enabled us to do that one. Your move.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
