Creation scientists do have a creation model.
Genesis is not a scientific model, And creationism is not a scientific theory, It makes no predictions, has no experiments, and it cannot be falsified, all of which are required for something to be a scientific theory.
Creation scientists are a much scientists as Evolution are
The difference between creation "scientists" and evolutionary biologists is that the biologist actually uses science to prove his theories, where all the creationist can do is quote the bible and write fanfic for the parts that the bible doesn't cover.
In fact, Many branches of science were founded by Creation scientists.
No, they were not, while several branches of science where created by people who belived the creation story (And considering that Evo. Theory has only been around for about 200 years it's hardly suprising) But that does not make them "creation scientists". It's akin to saying that a physicist that happens to belive that unicorns are real is a "unicorn scientist".
So without Creationists there would be no science
The fundamental sciences existed long before your bible did, and were first described by pagan Greeks and Egyptians (i.e. people who had not even heard of your "creation myth") What you are doing is stealing credit and claiming for your religion, something that it had nothing to do with.