Home Archives Random Quotes Latest Comments Top 100 Submit Quote Search Log In

Quote# 52463

(Emphasis added by me)

Subject: Gay rights

Message: A straight person cannot marry the person of his choice; he can only marry the woman of his choice. Gays have the same right. Legally, they are both treated equally. ****Sexual attraction has never been a proponent for marriage.****

If two straight men wanted to marry for business advantages, just like many men and women do, that wouldn't be allowed. ****Marriage has nothing to do with love, attraction, or compatability.**** Straights marry for many reasons.

Straights and gays have the same choice, therefore, the same rights.

normobrian, This was sent via email after a response i made on Yahoo Answers 51 Comments [11/18/2008 12:26:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Kimby
WTF?! || meh
Username:
Comment:



1 2 3
Dan Onymous

Gibberish. Gays shouldn't be allowed to get married just because you don't love your wife or find her sexually attractive? How is that rational?

11/18/2008 12:32:27 PM

Jesus Klingon

Sexual attraction has never been a proponent for marriage.

and

Marriage has nothing to do with love, attraction, or compatibility.

I remember that show: Married With Children.

11/18/2008 12:33:41 PM

aaa

Thick one.

11/18/2008 12:34:57 PM

Ambrielle

Marriage. Ur doin it rong.

11/18/2008 12:35:17 PM

HoJuSimpson

Ok, so marriage is one big business arrangement for straight people and it doesn't matter if they even like each other let alone want to be with each other? I see. This is even too stupid for the word salad award.

@ Jesus Klingon, hey now, Al totally loved Peggy :p psycho dad, psycho dad...psycho dad!

11/18/2008 12:51:06 PM

MK

So if marriage is not based on love, attraction, sexual attraction, or compatibility... uh, what IS it based on?

11/18/2008 12:58:56 PM

MrsYoungie

Ah yes, the traditional marriage - where it's all based on the woman's huge - - - tracts of land!

11/18/2008 1:02:49 PM

werewolf

This is pure unadulterated manure.

11/18/2008 1:06:12 PM

Paschal Wagner

A straight person cannot marry the person of his choice; he can only marry the woman of his choice.

IOW: Women are not persons.

11/18/2008 1:06:28 PM

Mister Spak

"****Sexual attraction has never been a proponent for marriage.**** "

That is some heavy duty stupid right there.

11/18/2008 1:14:54 PM

maevemab

Damn...According to this, I did it wrong.

11/18/2008 1:49:35 PM

Thundersqueaks

"****Sexual attraction has never been a proponent for marriage.****

I want to meet this Sexual Attraction person, and ask them why they're not a proponent of marriage.

11/18/2008 2:01:33 PM

Hakar

I can marry any woman I want (within reason off course), but no woman can. That is discrimination.

11/18/2008 2:12:20 PM

Survival of the Shittest

I once tried to marry the woman I wanted. Anyone know if restraining orders run out?

11/18/2008 2:32:29 PM

Voice of Logic

That's the exact same thing as saying, "Sure you have freedom of religion. You can be a Christian or go die."

11/18/2008 2:34:35 PM

a mind far far away

Double talk and bad word play. What, no puns? Oh well.

11/18/2008 2:49:55 PM

Reverend Jeremiah

LOL..fundy word salad and brain gravy.. I wonder if his thoughts are this scrambled as well?

11/18/2008 3:09:12 PM

Route666

He's trying to say you get married to make babies.

11/18/2008 3:13:34 PM

Horsefeathers

"If two straight men wanted to marry for business advantages, just like many men and women do, that wouldn't be allowed. ****Marriage has nothing to do with love, attraction, or compatability.**** Straights marry for many reasons."

What fucking century are you living in?

11/18/2008 3:17:55 PM

Kris

Paschal Wagner: Nice catch.

Nomobrain, I'm sorry that your culture's idea of marriage is so sad and retarded, but here in America, we usually marry people we at least think we're in love with.

In our (i.e. United States of America, and not Hicksville, Tenn.) culture of drive-through weddings and publicized romances, I don't think it's a grievance to allow two persons (male or female; females ARE human, you know) to marry for love, regardless of whether neither partner or both have a penis.

Therefore, NoMoBrain, I have but this to say: get laid fucker.

11/18/2008 3:24:13 PM

GigaGuess

Yes, and when we get our way, you'd have the freedom to marry any person of YOUR choice. Still equal.

11/18/2008 3:29:36 PM

Skyknight

Didn't we abjure this methodology some time ago? I somehow doubt that Norm would bat an eye if arranged marriages made a strong comeback...

11/18/2008 3:34:01 PM

anonymous

If men can only marry women and women can only marry men, that's sexism.

11/18/2008 4:10:04 PM

Asuka

The Middle Ages just called, they want their alliances of convenience back.

11/18/2008 4:13:16 PM

Vince

If this is true, then what is the problem with allowing gay marriage? According to this logic, it would increase the freedom even straight people have regarding marriage in that they can marry people of their same sex for business advantages.

11/18/2008 4:23:46 PM
1 2 3