Abba'sLil'Girl #fundie

Abba'sLil'Girl #fundie prophecyfellowship.org

Think about it. If you saw millions of people being changed into glorious resurrected bodies (including the dead in the grave) and then watched as they ascended to God in Glory - which shown greatly before you, would you be able to ignore what you saw and accept the lies of the government as to what happened? What if the Rapture takes place behind the veil and the whole world simultaneously misses it? What if the whole world who is still in sin is unable to witness the Rapture in real time because they do not posses the righteousness of Christ?

I believe it is a priviledge and honor to see the Glory of God. I don't believe that those who are still in sin will be able to witness God's Glory in real time. To them, I think it will seem as if we simply vanished into thin air leaving an opportunity for the evil one to deceive - as there will be no witnesses to say otherwise - that is, unless God chooses to let a few left behind see in order to testify for those who may believe. Only God knows. :)

38 comments

old comment by Reverend Jeremiah

No..I would see all of you Rapture Ready types floating up into the sky and I would be at first (admitantly) shocked to actually see that this OBVIOUS bullshit happened. After that It would more than likely be like a kick to my head; "Hey...all of the loony fundies are floating away.." To which I will start jumping up and down laughing heartily and waving goodby to you. I think I might actually get down on my hands and knees and pray to Jesus; "Jesus, I know I have said before that you are not worthy of worship or adoration because you sit back and watch little children get rapped and murdered..but, I have to be honest with yah Jeeps...you FINALLY did something good for humanity. Now if you truly are a loving god you will take all of those extremist Muslim types along with them. Thanks JC, maybe you're not as bad as I thought." I wouldnt say Amen, because I think that word sounds retarded, but Im sure JC will get the message anyways.

old comment by To Be Fair

Food for thought . . .

I can't speak for Aba'slilGirl, and I doubt she's on the board to respond to your comments and questions (considering her comment was copied to this board probably without her knowledge) but to be fair - and that IS what we intelligent, objective thinkers strive to be, right? - she simply seems to be offering up her beliefs based upon what she understands much like any other human being with a particular stance on anything they value does. Whether or not any one else values that belief, I don't think is really important to her, although I am speculating here.

To be fair, I looked into the Christian scriptures, and it does appear that Jesus seems to suggest something along the lines as she is implying . . . (matthew 24) "36"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. 37As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 40Two men will be in the field; one will be taken and the other left. 41Two women will be grinding with a hand mill; one will be taken and the other left.

42"Therefore keep watch, because you do not know on what day your Lord will come. 43But understand this: If the owner of the house had known at what time of night the thief was coming, he would have kept watch and would not have let his house be broken into. 44So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him.

45"Who then is the faithful and wise servant, whom the master has put in charge of the servants in his household to give them their food at the proper time? 46It will be good for that servant whose master finds him doing so when he returns. 47I tell you the truth, he will put him in charge of all his possessions. 48But suppose that servant is wicked and says to himself, 'My master is staying away a long time,' 49and he then begins to beat his fellow servants and to eat and drink with drunkards. 50The master of that servant will come on a day when he does not expect him and at an hour he is not aware of. 51He will cut him to pieces and assign him a place with the hypocrites, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth."

So, if one believes the Christian Scriptures to be true, her above interpretation is neither illogical or unreasonable within it's context. If one doesn't believe the Christian Scriptures to be true, then what does it matter what she believes? Furthermore, if there is even a remote possibility of truth to be present in the Christian scriptures, not objectively investigating the claims - without bias - but settling for covert insults of the "faithful" simply because they annoy, seems rather childish and almost hypocritical. Don't you agree?