[Behold, Byers Mega Tard Special ... the follow up to his "mathematics is for kids" post, with some nice sexist and racist observations on non-WASP mathematicians, and more tard about Mount Everest. Enjoy the sensation of your neurons dying as you read this ...]

Hit a nerve with the math thing.
On another forum we discussed why women fail relative to men in math and I said its not because of inferior intelligence but because of motivation. Women do not seek ambition and rewards pound for pound with men. So I said math is not a more intelligent study but simply seen as more intelligent. So men/ethnic groups (in north America) who are seeking prestige in academic subjects prevail because they think its a smarter thing. Yet in fact its a simplier subject that rewards simple processes of thought. In fac examples of kids or retarded people who do great feats in math are the evidence it is simple processes of reasoning in close boundaries with instant confirmations which entrench the thought processes.
Unlike subjects that require higher intelligence due to orbits of thought and not simple lines.
I added chess, classical music etc as examples of how motivation brings results in simnple but seeming more intellectual pursuits. Its easy to do well in math if you are simply studious. Its not about intellect. Therefore men/ethnics just want the prestige of intellectual success and wrongly conclude math is one of them. Women don't have this desire but do intellectualy compete equally with men in subjects they care about. Though only studious ones also. Not real life.
So women are doctors, lawyers equally in the schools. Not math class or others. Motives not genetics.
Whew Off thread.But you complained.

Anyways back to everest.
Yes it was created during the the flood by the continents being moved from a central mass to the present lines.
Said before and complaints about heat brought up.
All mt ranges are seen as from the smash/splitt during the flood. They were shot higher then anything before. The mts before the flood are presumed to have been as small as one can get and be called mts.
So less water needed to cover.
Less deep oceans replaced by deep oceans, from moving continents, is one place to store excess water after. Your looking at the flood water.
Anyways just a point that the earth before the flood was different then after. We can use data of continental drift for our models. Except we would call it continental redeye