I'm not surprised that they lied about the percentage of gays. They also lied about how heterosexuals were just as much at risk to contract HIV as the homosexuals. The VAST majority of those diagnosed can be attributed to homosexual sex. Next on the list is HIV drug users (I think).
Anyway, it has to do with the way the virus itself is transmitted. Not to be offensive (and I apologize if it is) but the very nature of homosexual sex makes the virus most easily transferred that way. (Make any sense?)
They lied about heterosexuals being at a high risk in order to get funding for research and treatments and such.
46 comments
Actually, while male homosexuals are somewhat more likely to contract HIV than heterosexuals of either gender, lesbians have a significantly lower rate of HIV infection than any other segment of the population. In fact, although male-to-male and male-to-female sexual contact were listed as risk factors by the Center for Disease Control, lesbian sex is not listed at all, because cases of lesbians contracting HIV are extremely rare.
If male homosexuals are far more likely to contract HIV than female homosexuals, then clearly "the nature of homosexual sex" has NOTHING to do with HIV transmission. But I doubt angelka71 has ever actually read any statistics on HIV transmission, because she never made that simple logical connection.
If I'm not mistaken, those most at risk for getting HIV/AIDS are black heterosexuals. I seen that study done somewhere, although I can't remember where, and I'm not sure how accurate it is. However, the fact is that heterosexuals can get it just as easily as homosexuals. Lying for jebus makes baby satan cry.
"(Make any sense?)"
Nope.
Next!
"the very nature of homosexual sex makes the virus most easily transferred that way."
No, HIV transfers more easily with anal sex. Completely indifferent to the sexual preferences of the butt in question.
A female taking it up the ass has the same chance as a male taking it up the ass. The chance is slightly greater for anal than vaginal sex because the anus is more likely to have small rips that allow the virus to pass into the blood stream.
The sheer numbers of hetros world wide who are positive greatly outnumbers gays that are.
Most of the problem would end if people would just use condoms.
So, you guys are against AIDS research. Because AIDS is a precious gift, from the god you invented for yourselves, to smite teh guays.
Gay men are at greater risk because men are more efficient transmitters of the disease than women. If a man has sex with a man, there's a greater chance he'll infect his partner and then his partner will infect someone else. If a man has sex with a woman, he can transmit it to her easily, but she's less likely to pass it on. So what we would expect is the highest infection rates among gay men, then straight women, then straight men, and finally gay women. And that's exactly what we see.
Gay men have a higher infection rate in the US, where women are educated and have more say in their relationships. In the Third World, women have high infection rates because they're uneducated and powerless.
...the very nature of homosexual sex makes the virus most easily transferred that way. (Make any sense?)
Assuming that you're referring to anal sex, you should be aware that a large majority of fruits don't engage in it. That majority sticks primarily with oral sex. Have you sucked your husband's c*** lately? Then you're just as likely to spread AIDS as a queer.
I swear that fundie girls are way more screwed up about sex than any fundie guy.
I'm not surprised that you lied about the rates of transmission of HIV in various population groups, afterall, you needed to lie to make the data fit your story. Kind of like your sort do when science disagrees with the Bible.
"Next on the list is HIV drug users (I think)"
You think? For God's sake, if you're going to spout bullshit at least do it with some conviction.
John said: In the Third World, women have high infection rates because they're uneducated and powerless.
I say: yes, because some men with AIDS believe that sex with a virgin cures it. So once they're diagnosed they go out and find a virgin to (often) rape.
Everyone who has unprotected sex is at the same risk of contracting HIV, you dumbfuck.
Please, don't have children
The nature of heterosexual sex is the same as homosexual sex, ie- fluid exchange and penetration. The partner with whom you are having sex makes no difference to he virus as it is spread just as easily by either method... oh, just realised this was from RR, why do I bother?
Sexual orientation has nothing to do with that. I don't expect anyone to be dumb just because they're blonde. If you're dumb, you're dumb. Just like I can gather from this post and where you're posting it, you're a complete case. I don't know your REAL orientation or your hair color. "You big dummy." ~ Fred Sanford
They lied about heterosexuals being at a high risk in order to get funding for research and treatments and such.
Yeah because finding a cure is a bad thing...jesus fucking christ..
They lied about heterosexuals being at a high risk in order to get funding for research and treatments and such.
No they didn't. The reason heteros are at high risk is because of people and mentality like you and yours, with your self made theories of how the HIV virus is transferred. Penis and vaginal wall is just as easily transversed, but that small fact messes up your self righteous ranting against homosexuals, doesn't it.
The VAST majority of those diagnosed can be attributed to homosexual sex.
Source for this please?
They lied about heterosexuals being at a high risk in order to get funding for research and treatments and such.
So because it's almost impossible for lesbians to get HIV, that means God loves them the most? I guess I should move to Commercial street.
So you're basically saying if it only affected homosexuals, we shouldn't spend one red dime on it? nice.
Oh, and FYI the fastest growing HIV group is heterosexual teenagers, especially in poorer areas.
The virus transmits almost as easily through heterosexual sex, especially for women. The only difference is that anal sex often leads to small tears in the anus, which increased the chances of the disease entering the bloodstream. However, heterosexually couples can also have anal sex, and often do. Even vaginal intercourse can cause tearing, which also leads to an increased risk of transmission.
"the very nature of homosexual sex makes the virus most easily transferred that way"
You're talking of anal, yeah?
Okay, IGNORING the fact that you have no clue on viral pathology, are you seriously saying "It's just the gays, let 'em die"?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
