People only need to have one sex-partner their entire lives. Anyone who has more than one sex-partner (thereby committing the sin of fornication) deserves to get an STD and be cursed for the rest of their lives with it!
Seriously, why do people fornicate so much? I'll honestly never understand it. Don't people want to share their sex-life with just one person, thereby making the union even more special?
114 comments
oooh looky, another 13 year old virgin on Yahstupid Anklebiters. Ooh, ooh, let's all take advice from teh tard. Yah.
Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?
Anyone who keeps calling sex 'fornication' is either a rabid fundie, a virgin or both.
"Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?"
You really don't try to hide the fact that you are a 15 year old virgin with religion based sexual hangups, do you?
I'll honestly never understand it. Don't people want to share their sex-life with just one person, thereby making the union even more special?
"making the union more special" = "If my wife had sex with other men before me she'd realize I'm shit in the sack and then either I'd have to, you know, put some fucking effort into it or she'd leave me?"
Last time I checked, 'fornication' usually meant sex between 2 people not married, not just someone who's slept with more than 1 person. Just because you - probably a virgin - think sex is "more special" when you're only with one person forever doesn't mean everyone else does nor has to.
And you are a complete cunt for saying anyone deserves an STD. oh and I think it's funny that on the source, the poster says sex isn't terribly important, but I'm willing to bet they think gays are evil because they can't "naturally" reproduce lulz.
Why do people have sex so much (there, fixed for ya...)?
Well, it has been proven that people are actually a polygamous species, but I doubt you would listen to that. Evolution and all.
Really, I'd be happy for just one partner.
More are welcome, though.
Seriously, why do people fornicate so much? I'll honestly never understand it
Said the many who's never gotten any at all. When you lose your virginity, you'll understand it.
Fornicate:
Origin:
154555; < LL fornicatus (ptp. of fornicari to consort with prostitutes), equiv. to L fornic- (s. of fornix) arch, vault, basement, brothel + -atus
Funny how "cruising for whores" turned into "sex with someone besides your Church-approved spouse".
People only need to have one sex-partner their entire lives.
You mean like Abraham, or David, or Solomon, or Lot, or... oh, wait.
You, sir or madam, are a goddamned idiot.
Here's a 5 spot. Buy a fuckin' clue and get back to me.
Monogomy is not a natural thing.
It is simply an idea raised by common monotheistic religion.
People have sex so much because its a natural urge, and because its fun.
Sure, We technicly only need one partner, but that doesn't neccisarily mean qe want one,or share your belief that more than one is wrong.
Why do you want to force your beliefs on us? What if your wrong and your potentially ruining someones life. You never know, and thats why you should never be a zealot.
Wow. Most people in here are even more fucking retarded than the fundie.
Come on, repeat after me: Sex is NOT the only thing in life.
I'm 26, I'm a man. I'm not ugly and I don't have low self-esteem -- I've had 2 sex partners in my life, and actually regret the first one a bit. One-nighters just don't interest me, and never have.
Yet, somehow, I don't feel I've missed out on a big part of life, because sticking my willie into random holes at regular intervals is not the damn definition of life.
Now, for the complete idiots out there, who need everything spoon fed to them, I'm NOT agreeing with the fundie either. You don't "deserve an STD" for having multiple partners - that's your own damn choice, but you people are just as bad as him, just from another perspective.
I'm a bigendered person who is dating a guy and a girl exclusively, so I agree with this asshole in principle :P
(is J.H.'s head going to explode if he meets me in person?)
@ Slater:
Come on, that's just your view. If you don't care for sex, or are afraid of physical intimacy, or whatever your problem is, or even if you don't see it as a problem, please . . . don't burden us with it. Keep it to yourself.
Of course sex isn't the be-all and end-all of life; nobody said it was. You just interpreted their comments that way.
Try to resist slagging off the rest of the posters just because they don't see things exactly your way. You don't want to sound like a fundie, do you?
fergus
redfergus:
Aaand you prove yourself to be exactly as retarded as I thought.
Please, please, next time you want to contradict someone, read what they said first. Could I at least ask you to do that much? It's really not that hard - you just point your eyes at the written text and READ!
Now, let me sum it up for you, just this once (at let me again remind you to actually READ):
I was EXACTLY saying that it was MY view. Are you with me so far? I was saying that some of us DO NOT feel that we are missing a part of life, just because we haven't fucked a hundred people. I could be just me (though I know it's not), but that's irrelevant. What some people here are saying and/or implying, is that there is something wrong with not having multiple partners. That you must be a virgin or no-life nerd if you don't. THAT'S what I'm contradicting.
If you don't get it now, there's nothing I can do for you.
Well Slater, you were still being a dick painting all of us with one brush like that.
I've come to see the FSTDT comments section like I see /b/...10% good posts, 90% bullshit+blowing off steam.
G Zimmer:
And another idiot who can't read.
I never painted you all. I never once said "everyone" or "you all" or whatever.
What is it with you people? Are you so proud of being brain dead that you absolutely have to display it every chance you get?
@Slater
'Retarded' seems like a favorite word of yours ....
Sadly it seems to stick to you more than to the other posters here, because starting a discussion by insulting almost everyone isn't quite the tactic I would use.
just my 2 cents
@redfurgus: Come on, that's just your view. If you don't care for sex, or are afraid of physical intimacy, or whatever your problem is, or even if you don't see it as a problem, please . . . don't burden us with it. Keep it to yourself.
Not caring for sex is a problem? Or could it be that some people just don't care for it? Kinda like some people may not like chocolate. It doesn't mean it's a problem, it's just how they are.
I could care less for sex and I could care less if someone wants just one sex partner or as much sex as possible, but I sure as hell care when people start pidgeonholing everyone and/or calling us all sinners for not giving a damn how many sex partners one should/shouldn't have. Not your damn business, not my damn business, just teach us some safe sex, and let us fucking be.
Darn:
Your 2 cents aren't really worth a lot then, are they?
First of all: I used the word "retarded" twice. You used the word "to" three times, so that would have to be your favourite word, wouldn't it? Or are you just grasping at straws to find some immature way to insult me?
Secondly: I made it pretty clear that I was talking about the little Einsteins who felt that sex equalled life, or that anyone who didn't feel you have to have many sex partners would have to be a loser. Thus, anyone who feels offended either can't read, or is one of those.
In the latter case, calling them idiots wouldn't stick anything to myself.
In the former case, I really don't give a rat's. They can learn to read.
In either case, the insults started with them, so don't even try that hypocritical shit.
--
Godwin's Ghost:
Couldn't agree more.
"Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?"
It's evolution. Everyone alive is decended from fornicators thereby passing on fornicator genes.
Funny how fundies consider sex such a holy and idyllic thing inside of marriage and such a sinful and disgusting thing outside of it. Hey guys, it's pretty much the same physically either way, if you care for the person, it's no more special because of a piece of paper.PS KIng Solomon in the Bible must have some real special unions with his 700 wives!!!PS @Thinking Allowed, King David only had 7 wives.
...and another idiot. Sigh.
"Sexual dysfunction"? That's nice. You do realise you are doing exactly the same as the Christians you are here to point fingers at, don't you? I surely hope so, but then again - with your obvious lack of anything resembling a brain, I don't expect too much, afacelessatheist.
Well, you're perfectly entitled to do this with your own life, and good luck to you. But don't you think it a tad presumptuous to say that this is the way to go for everyone else, and that they deserve to be diseased if they don't?
@Slater:
I say sexual dysfunction because you came to the comments section with your panties in a bunch over this topic. In other words you were acting really, overtly defensive.
People usually get only get that defensive when it's a sensitive subject to them. If you've only had a couple of partners and thought that was perfectly cool, I doubt your comments would have been as animated as they are.
Yes, I did take a bit of a swing at you and yes, I agree that it was a rather low blow but considering how you came in here acting like an ass, it was well deserved.
afacelessatheist:
Hypocrite.
If saying someone is an idiot for saying something idiotic makes you "overtly defensive" and proves the other person's point, then everyone on this site is religious - we all come here to ridicule fundies and call them idiots when applicable.
Next time, try thinking. Just a little bit. Few seconds should do, really.
If that curse (and yes, that is a *curse*) came to pass, there would be almost nobody in this world without an STD.
Also, what about widowed people?
Behold, the world's first living heart donor.
@Slater:
There is a bit of a difference between making fun of things other people have written in a completely different place and being confrontational/instigating a fight with just about everyone on a message board by going to said message board and posting that the people there are even more fucking retarded then the person they are discussing.
Sex is an important aspect of our nature and while some folks don't care for it for emotional reasons, have a lower libido, or were lucky enough to actually find someone they truly can spend the rest of their lives with the first time around, I think that's much more of the exception than the rule.
From what I've read, people's issue with this statement seems to be this person's disgust and aversion to sex - as if the thought of having to do it with more than one person in their lifetime was unthinkable yet you turned it into something completely different. You are reading shit into stuff that's said because you, as I said, are overly sensitive about this subject, and it shows.
Translation: "I spend all my days poking my nose into other people's sex lives and making disparaging comments about them because I am jealous and nobody will fuck me."
There's a difference between being abstinent for self control and being abstinent because nobody likes you.
Because there are those that see life as a restaurant, and those that see it as a buffet. The restaurant crowd sits down, looks at the menu, ponders for a while, and will order. They may or may not like what they got, but are stuck with it in the end. The buffet crowd picks, and chooses, trying what looks good, and makes notes from there. They may not enjoy everything, but they figure out what works for them, and what doesn't.
Oh, and saying anyone deserves an incurable STI, for ANY reason, makes you a colossal prick.
@Slater (in regards to your first post): I too have had much lower than the average number of sexual partners for Americans under 25. However, that's my business, and I'm cool with it. We are laughing at the hysterical fundie who is obviously not comfortable with the decisions he/she's made and is taking it out on everybody by cursing them. I really don't know where you got the impression the other posters are laughing at ALL people who've had maybe one or two partners, or none at all.
Come on, it's really not about you.
"Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?"
Because monogamy is a relatively new social structure that's imposed by people like you. Humans aren't pre-programmed to be monogamous. Wouldn't have served the species very well early on given our long gestation and rearing periods.
"I'll honestly never understand it."
Ask someone who looks smart to explain it to you. Ask outside your church.
"Don't people want to share their sex-life with just one person, thereby making the union even more special?"
Some do. Most abide by it. You're still not going to get away from desiring others, at some point at least, no matter how much you love the person you're with.
Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?
For the same reason you jerk off each time you get a hardon. Seriously, is that so hard (pun intended) to understand?
I reckon J.H. has caught a dose, and is lashing out the only way he knows how.
Itchy knackers, much, J.H.? Pus-weeping glans sores? Flu that doesn't clear up?
Good.
Dear Slater -
Please get yourself an account on the FSTDT forums, where you can rant and rave and insult other people on this site to your heart's content. I come here to keep up with the latest fundie insanity, and to get a good chuckle and occasionally even learn something from the resulting comments from non-fundies. Please quit spoiling my pre-work entertainment with all this back and forth. Thank you.
"Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?"
Is that seriously a serious question?
'Cause wow man. Get a lasting ball injury when you were ten? Warranty run out on your sex-drive?
Don't be surprized if you end up being a very lonely person for the rest of your life. What about babies who are born with HIV? Did they deserve it?
Don't people want to share their sex-life with just one person, thereby making the union even more special?
Having sex with just one person doesn't make your relationship any more special. If you truely loved someone, you wouldn't give a rat's ass if they were a virgin or not.
"There is a bit of a difference between making fun of things other people have written in a completely different place and being confrontational/instigating a fight with just about everyone on a message board by going to said message board and posting that the people there are even more fucking retarded then the person they are discussing."
This is the fucking internet. Can't handle it, GTFO or run off to some site that warps you in cotton wool.
It's not like Slater's going to sex.com and saying this stuff. People are here hopefully to exercise a bit of reason and and such there is nothing wrong with his comments. In fact I happen to agree with him, though calling everyone retards probably came across as a bit juvenile.
Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?
speaking for myself: it was enjoyable and harmless when i was younger.
People only need to have one sex-partner their entire lives.
[ Except, y'know, when they don't. Seriously, why do you care so much for how many people others fornicate? ]
Anyone who has more than one sex-partner (thereby committing the sin of fornication) deserves to get an STD and be cursed for the rest of their lives with it!
[ Why do you hate people so much? What's so terrible about sex? ]
Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?
[ I speak as a virgin here: why not? They are free to do whatever they damn please. ]
I'll honestly never understand it. Don't people want to share their sex-life with just one person, thereby making the union even more special?
[ Why should they? There isn't anything mystical about sex that sharing it with others will destroy the experience forever. What is the one person is the wrong one? What if you saved yourself for long and fell into the wrong person? Shit happens.
Seriously dude, get over it. ]
@Won Ton:
He was calling me a hypocrite and that was my explanation as to why I was not. No one was talking crazy shit about people that only had a few sex partners, it was all in his head and he threw a veritable fit over it. They were talking shit about people that have serious hang ups about sex and/or virgins that have a case of sour grapes.
If people who have hang ups about sex don't like it then perhaps they should do as you suggested and GTFO or run off to some site that warps (you meant wraps) you in cotton wool rather than bitch about it here. Just a friendly suggestion.
@afacelessatheist:
"There is a bit of a difference between making fun of things other people have written in a completely different place and being confrontational/instigating a fight with just about everyone on a message board"
Yes, one is going behind people's back, the other is saying it to their face. Are you implying that talking behind people's back is somehow better?
I never said it wasn't more the exception than the rule to not be driven by your cock. Don't know where you got that idea. I'm merely saying that alone does not make you a loser or whatever. That's REALLY all there is to it, and nothing else. But apparently a lot of people feel very offended by my not agreeing with every non-fundie on this site. Me, I think it's rather pathetic to suppress your disagreements with others in your own "group", just so you can feel like you belong. I don't care about that.
"You are reading shit into stuff that's said because you, as I said, are overly sensitive about this subject, and it shows."
Repeating a lie doesn't make it more true. As I already said, if I'm overtly defensive, so is everyone else in here. If that proves the opposition's point, then everone on FSTDT is a fundie. That doesn't make sense. I contradict people for generalising and making stupid claims about virginity and lifelessness due to few sex partners. If I had had a hundred of them myself, I would STILL say the same thing. NOT constantly fucking is just as much people's own choice, as constantly fucking.
@Won Ton:
Didn't call everyone retards - just the ones being stupid. But yeah, I know it might have seemed a tad over the top... maybe it still does. If so, that's because the double standards annoy me, and probably because this kind of language is more normal where I'm from. Even the PM swears on national tv around here, something I don't think I'll ever see a POTUS do.
Sorry (to everyone) if my choice of words made you focus on them alone, but laughing at fundies for saying one thing, then turning around and saying the exact opposite, but just as bad, thing is hypocritical. I want to laugh at the fundie nutjobs as much as anyone, but I just can't ignore it when the group I'm pointing fingers with is just as bad.
@Slater:
It has nothing to do with 'better' and I didn't imply such. They are just separate situations for the reasons noted.
"a lot of people feel very offended by my not agreeing with every non-fundie on this site"
Bullshit. I've seen disagreements in the time I have been reading here but there is giving your opinion on something and then there is acting like a pissed off little drama queen.
If you don't get it, I really don't give a fuck at this point. So go ahead, whine, bitch, scream, yell, throw a hissy fit like a toddler that people are being mean. Knock yourself out.
@afacelessatheist:
"there is giving your opinion on something and then there is acting like a pissed off little drama queen."
Yeah, and now you're being hypocritical again, you div.
YOU have been constantly whining about this since you first felt the need to respond.
YOU are still acting like a spoilt little girl with hurt feelings and a grudge against anything different than you.
I'm not going try to explain this to you anymore. It's pretty simple, and you're obviously more interested in lying and slandering than actually reaching an understanding. That's below me, so you go right ahead and cry yourself to sleep. I'll just talk to the grown-ups instead, all right?
(Reply written in your fucking tone. Don't even try wiping that off on me, Dr. Double-standard)
"you're obviously more interested in lying and slandering than actually reaching an understanding. That's below me"
You're done. Apparently, it looks like we have a troll in the dungeon after all. I'm only sorry it took me so long to realize it. I really want to weep when I think of all those minutes I just wasted on your trolling ass. *sigh*
afacelessatheist:
That's nice. Really. Just too bad this is a comment board, which means everyone else can see what we've both said, Einstein. That means trying to convince everyone else that I am the one being unnecessarily demeaning is not going to work.
I'd dare you to come up with a single thing I've said that could possibly be trolling, and isn't just plain logical, but... I already know you can't. It's too obvious you're just trying to play the victim. Just get over it, would you?
@Slater:
Ok, I'll bite one more time. Never have I said that I wasn't trying to be condescending or a bitch, I said that you deserved it for the way you were acting. Perhaps you need to take your own advice and learn to fucking read.
I won't be back to read any responses. I'm finished with you. FOADIAF troll.
@afacelessatheist:
And once again you're being hypocritical. If I deserve being bitched at for "acting that way", then the people I called idiots deserved being called idiots for acting that way. Seriously, are you unable to think at all? EVERY single thing you've said - and that's quite a lot by now - can be turned right around on yourself. Not a single argument or insult from you wasn't as idiosyncratic to yourself as anyone else.
Once again, if you can't name a single thing I've said that could be perceived as trolling, stop using that immature insult. Nothing I've said isn't true, which your inability to contradict has more or less proven, and saying the truth is not trolling, no matter how you say it. At most, it's being a dick about it.
Can you please stop crying now? It's getting pathetic.
"He was calling me a hypocrite and that was my explanation as to why I was not."
Because you do it behind people's backs and not to their faces? Do you not realise that your explanation was the very definition of hypocrisy?
"No one was talking crazy shit about people that only had a few sex partners, it was all in his head and he threw a veritable fit over it."
Consider the following comments
1 You obviously haven't lived.
2 If you don't care for sex, or are afraid of physical intimacy, or whatever your problem is, or even if you don't see it as a problem.
3 You need to get laid to understand why.
"If people who have hang ups about sex don't like it then perhaps they should do as you suggested and GTFO"
No one apart from the actual fundie seems to have a hang up about sex. Slather's problem is with the people here seeming to care so much about whether someone has got laid or not. Trying to dismiss his comments as being motivated by a hang-up over sex or virginal sour grapes is dishonest or stupid.
"or run off to some site that warps (you meant wraps) you in cotton wool"
Yes I did mean wraps! Well done for being so perceptive!
Don't people want to share their sex-life with just one person, thereby making the union even more special?
Yeah, hate makes 'the union' so special you want to kill for it...
Let me see. Since there are divorcees who remarry, widowers and widows who remarry too and those who fornicate and then marry the person they fornicate with, I think that your rumblings make no sense. And what do you consider "special"?. Nature is not politically and religiously correct and doesn´t care what you are able to understand, or rather not. The cohesion and perpetuation of the species is more important, apparently.
Let me explain this through an analogy that is probably more appropriate and easy to understand for you.
Sex is like ice cream. There were times I went to an ice cream spot, and would have chocolate ice cream. Other times, colour sprinkles. Hell, I'd take two flavours at one time, experiencing both strawberry and bubblegum. I even would get tubs to experience it for a while. Now I have an ice cream maker at home.
And the thing is, my relationship with my ice cream maker has not suffered because of me having experienced other flavours. In fact, it's made it better. I truly can enjoy my ice cream now, knowing exactly what I want, and my ice cream maker gives it to me.
Now, some people might prefer sticking to vanilla. More power to them, but people who have had a bit of a varied taste should not be vilified or hoped to deal with STDs.
> Seriously, why do people fornicate so much?
Spreaking as a virgin, I have no idea the state of mind that could lead you to ask such a question...
Dude, it's their life. If people want to sleep with more than one person, let them. If they don't want to, want to wait until marriage (like me, but not for religious reasons), or are more selective of their partner/partners, let them. It's their life, not yours :P
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.