Darwinian Evolution is pseudo-science. It should rather be taught in religion class, hopefully along with the perspective that it has far less supporting evidence than the Bible itself (e.g. archeology supporting Biblical people and places, secular history reinforcing Biblical accounts, geology supporting a worldwide flood). Darwinian evolution, for the most part, has not led to scientific discoveries, albeit Darwin\'s observations about genetic variation and natural selection were valuable. The simplistic stories and suggestive drawings of Darwinian evolutionists are totally inadequate to explain the irreducibly complex engineering that we\'re discovering in living organisms at a molecular level, engineering that humans cannot yet and probably will never match. Intelligent Design is, in my opinion, a logically superior perspective to Darwinian Evolution.
29 comments
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register. Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
