Quote# 54365
Isn’t the “gay” activist movement obnoxious? Now they’re staying home from work and “calling in gay” to protest Prop 8. But wasn’t it just a short time ago when the homosexual lobby was moaning that all across America people could be fired “just because they’re gay”? Now they’re taunting their employers using their gayness. Gee, it looks like their jobs are pretty safe!
I wonder: if a few homosexuals were to get fired for pulling this “Call in Gay” stunt, would they sue for being “discriminated” against? (That was a rhetorical question.)
Yes, the homosexual activists wear us all out with the non-stop militancy. (I think they wear out some of the non-militant homosexuals, too.) Enough already. I don’t think self-styled “queers” will stop agitating until every day of the year is devoted to some sort of belly-aching that aims to normalize that which is aberrant and sinful. Of course, like the pro-abortion-on-demand crowd, their ability to agitate has zero bearing on right vs. wrong.
Peter LaBarbera,
Americans for Truth about Homosexuality blog entry 41 Comments [12/17/2008 2:33:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: GreenEyedLilo
1 2
#814390
Nowonmai
Isn’t the “gay” activist movement obnoxious?
No, but you fundies are.
12/17/2008 10:09:42 AM
#814461
The Watcher
If Peter LaBarbera is so tired of the gays, why doesn't he find a different job? Maybe one that is not 100% dedicated to gay bashing?
12/17/2008 12:42:34 PM
#814464
IanC
No Pete, you are obnoxious.
12/17/2008 12:44:28 PM
#814527
Mister Spak
"Isn’t the “gay” activist movement obnoxious?"
You christians have got them beat.
12/17/2008 1:33:20 PM
#814669
If a tree falls in a forest, and kills Peter LaBarbera, would anyone miss him?
12/17/2008 2:56:58 PM
#814715
Netharian
What's obnoxious is Labarbera's obsession with gay men.
12/17/2008 3:42:13 PM
#814717
John
But wasn’t it just a short time ago when the homosexual lobby was moaning that all across America people could be fired “just because they’re gay”? Now they’re taunting their employers using their gayness. Gee, it looks like their jobs are pretty safe!
Well, yeah. But the employers didn't just do it out of the goodness of their hearts. Gay militancy was what won the right not to be fired just because the people they slept with at home on their own time had the same genitals.
12/17/2008 3:43:40 PM
#814829
anonymous
If you call in gay, I would fire you for slacking off and being a smartass.
12/17/2008 5:10:17 PM
#814842
Grigadil
Yes, the evangelical activists wear us all out with the non-stop militancy. (I think they wear out some of the non-militant Christians, too.) Enough already. I don’t think self-styled "junior Saviors" will stop agitating until every day of the year is devoted to some sort of belly-aching that aims to name every human behavior as aberrant and sinful. Of course, like the life-at-all-costs crowd, their ability to agitate has zero bearing on right vs. wrong.
Fixed, eh?
12/17/2008 5:17:20 PM
#815182
Dale
Spoken from a "true" man who cannot pull himself away from the Folsom Street fair.
I wonder....
12/17/2008 8:25:05 PM
#815306
atrasicarius
I know, man! What's up with this whole equality thing? Next, those niggers will want to use the same bathrooms as white people, and the women will want the right to vote! Oh, wait...
12/17/2008 9:28:03 PM
#815313
Old Viking
Peter gets very upset when others question his moral authority.
12/17/2008 9:32:53 PM
#815378
Moondog
"Calling in 'gay?'" Did anyone actually do that, or is that just an urban legend being promoted as truth?
12/17/2008 10:15:43 PM
#815406
Shadoboy
12/17/2008 10:39:53 PM
#815805
Zimmer
The 'caution' at the top of the page is the only thing I agree with on this piece of shit website.
12/18/2008 4:20:10 AM
#1442901
Ebon
DARVO
9/3/2012 2:42:57 PM
1 2