Quote# 54588

Doctors from the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons have stated that Obama uses techniques of mind control in his speeches and campaign symbols. For example, one speech declared, "a light will shine down from somewhere, it will light upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will say to yourself, 'I have to vote for Barack.'"[21]

Conservapedia -- Under the Entry for Barack Obama, Conservapedia 51 Comments [12/21/2008 7:05:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Alex

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 2 3 | bottom


You guys watch too much X-files.

12/21/2008 7:09:46 PM

Exmuslim Turk

Nah, let them rage and foam. It just justifies our position further.

12/21/2008 7:11:44 PM


I find this [Vote for Obama!] accusation to be [Vote for Obama!] silly and baseless. [Vote for Obama!] Do they really think we're so easily swayed? [Vote for Obama!] If we were, we would have been fundies too! [Vote for Obama!]

12/21/2008 7:13:25 PM

The Watcher

The "Association of American Physicians and Surgeons?" Is that kind of like the "American College of Pediatricians?"

You know, one of those official-sounding medical organizations that is, in fact, a fundie alternative to the real professional group?

12/21/2008 7:16:55 PM


Heh citation needed, buddy. And not some Fundie doctor out in Podunk, USA.

And also, you guys are fucking nutcases.

12/21/2008 7:32:23 PM

a mind far far away

FSTDT and CSTDT. A twofer. I don't see how anyone can take anything that conservapedia says seriously. You have to have one hell of a mental problem to actually think that they are right about anything.

12/21/2008 7:44:12 PM


The Conservapedia page about Barack Obama reads An apparent Muslim, Obama could use the Koran when he is sworn into office
Mad as a bucket of frogs, the lot of them.

12/21/2008 7:52:37 PM


An encyclopedia should conform to certain standards before it can be called an encyclopedia. I don't know why they call Conse4rvapedia an encyclopedia when it's just a bunch of uneducated, brainwashed shitheads promoting deranged ideaologies and opinions... and almost no facts.

12/21/2008 7:54:18 PM


I can't believe that anyone on Conservapedia takes the things they write seriously.

12/21/2008 8:05:18 PM


The "Association" is the same group that gave us the abortion/breast cancer link; that has fought against universal healthcare since the Truman Administration; that supplied the fundies with the "gays' lifespans are 20 years shorter" talking point.

12/21/2008 8:11:53 PM


For once, I'm very interested in reading the citation, not just knowing if it exists.

12/21/2008 8:19:18 PM


But do you see the fnords?

12/21/2008 8:35:19 PM

Old Viking

No, you're confused. The light Obama described will say "Buy Lowenbrau, buy Lowenbrau ..."

12/21/2008 9:03:10 PM

The "Association of American Physicians and Surgeons" is a joke started by some "John Birch Society" member doctors and is currently run by a homeschool curriculum advisor. It is as much a true representation of doctors as Conservapedia is of a real encyclopedia. In short, it is a group of right-wing liars hoping to fool rubes.

12/21/2008 9:07:41 PM


[Citation Very Badly Needed]

12/21/2008 9:12:58 PM


The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons is the same bunch who falsely claimed immigrants caused an increase in leprosy. Their "mind-control" nonsense about Obama is just an extension of their right-wing agenda.

12/21/2008 9:18:14 PM


Conservapedia: So badly wrong that it makes Wikipedia appear reliable.

12/21/2008 9:34:45 PM


The citation is an anonymously published article in a journal Aschlafly works for.

Reliable reporting, there.

12/21/2008 9:37:57 PM

Tomby Stone

It's fun to joke around and stuff but really, I'm just amazed at how fair and balanced Conservapedia is. I wonder how they even manage to show such little bias, it's surely some form of magic.

12/21/2008 9:50:11 PM

Mrs. Antichrist


12/21/2008 10:03:11 PM

Ronni Bom


12/21/2008 10:06:59 PM


When will Conservapedia learn that the truth doesn't have a "liberal bias". If you expect people to take your wikipedia knockoff even slightly seriously then perhaps it would be a good idea not allow your articles to be filled with personal opinions, unsupported claims, and outright lies. If Wikipedia and other online encyclopedia's truly have a "liberal bias" then wouldn't you be able to prove that using the truth rather than misinformation?

Just some advice that I know they won't take because conservapedia is little more than racial/ethnic/religious slurs, blind assertion, and anonymous personal attacks pretending to be a real encyclopedia. I feel sorry for the people who stumble upon it and naive enough to think that anything even resembling truth is to be found there.

12/21/2008 10:07:29 PM


Says a lot that conservapedia was started by high school students... Guess not very many made it to university.

12/21/2008 10:13:26 PM


Another repost.

12/21/2008 10:42:18 PM


Why am I suddenly thirsty for Barack Obama?

12/21/2008 10:51:38 PM

1 2 3 | top: comments page