The holes in Darwin's theory of evolution basically are scientific evidence of Creation because if Darwinism is flawed, what else is there? And we could do the Coca-Cola Can Theory, but I doubt we'd have to. Creation obviously has a Creator. I can't show you absolute, flawless, scientific proof of Creationism because proof is not faith, and I follow and believe Christ by faith, but there is evidence, as there is with evolution (which, personally, I think is flawed, and a very cruel hoax). I hope that this is helpful.
[Oooook! Any questions?]
38 comments
this evidence of which you speak,
did you read it in your textbook you the know the one the
"The holes in Darwin's theory of evolution basically are scientific evidence of Creation because if Darwinism is flawed, what else is there?"
Lamarkism, xenogenesis, spontaneous ordering...
Also, most "holes" in evolutionary theory raised by creationists usually fit into one of two categories; lies, distortions or misunderstandings of ET, and things we don't know yet.
"I follow and believe Christ by faith, but there is evidence, as there is with evolution"
Fair enough, but could I see your evidence too, so I can make my own mind up about it rather than have to "take it on faith"?
Coke can theory? Every putz knows that the Tinnus CocaColanus species underwent several evolutionary steps to be where it is now.
Btw, faith will never supersede proof in any event, so please desist from associating your fantasies with any science at all.
"In the service of the Master"
"Coca-Cola Can Theory"
but there is evidence, as there is with evolution
So, you admit to evidence of evolution. You claim to have evidence of creationism, yet neglect to cite.
In summary, you acknowledge evolution's validity, and fail to support creationism.
There may be hope for you yet.
"Creation obviously has a Creator. "
The creator obviously has a creator creator.
The creator creator obviously has a creator creator creator
Etc.
I can't show you absolute, flawless, scientific proof of Creationism because proof is not faith.
Great, now re-read the sentence you wrote until you get it.
Actually if Darwin is flawed, the model adjusts to fit the evidence.
Whereas you're trying to fit the evidence to your model.
"if Darwinism is flawed, what else is there?"
Even if Darwin's theories prove to be wrong, that doesn't automatically prove that the Genesis creation story is right. Every religion that ever existed has had a creation story of some sort, and they're all different. And even all those creation stories don't exhaust every possible reason behind the world's existence.
The holes in Biblical Creation basically are scientific evidence of Evolution because if the Bible is flawed, what else is there? And we could do the blind watch-maker Theory, but I doubt we'd have to. A crater obviously has a crater creator.
because if Darwinism is flawed, what else is there?
Further study? Better advances in scienctific research, leading to more refined theories?
Warning: False Dichotomy Alert (in the original post, not my response).
To: Idiot Fundie of the day.
It is always rewarding to see a young mind attempt to make sense of the world. However, I must caution you to avoid falling into a common trap: namely, that any errors in the Theory of Evolution automatically validate theological creationism. The ToE is a general one, and when looking back at fossil records, one must bear in mind that events may have happened which leave little direct evidence, but had an enormous impact on the life patterns of the day.
In short, simply because the current ToE has some holes in it does not make Creationism automatically correct or substantiated. I suggest you look up "James Usher" for further reading on why Creationism cannot be a valid theory.
if Darwinism is flawed, what else is there?
Whatever there is, "A magician who appeared out of nowhere made everything out of nothing, then made a man out of the dirt he created, and a woman out of a rib, and then they ate the magician's magic fruit because of a talking snake" isn't in the running.
Creation obviously has a Creator.
Bingo! Now prove there's a creator.
"In the service of the Master."
I can't decide
Creation obviously has a Creator. Who Created the Creator?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
