They've already proven that Rabbits are (by full definition) cud chewing animals. Biology was academically proven wrong (again) by the bible.
[12/1/2003 12:00:00 ]
Fundie Index: 4
I know Rabbits are cud chewing animals, but are rabbits?
(You get this if you've read the book Wicked.)
Um... That never happened.
Please define who 'they' are, and cite your sources. My research (yes, I actually did some, unlike you) could find no such evidence.
I haven't bothered to check this out yet, but I'm going to call bullshit on this until someone provides me with actual proof. Or if I find any myself if I can find any free time during all my murder sprees and general fucking-aboutery in GTA4.
shit =/= cud
10/18/2009 3:23:28 PM
animals. That's different.
Also, evolution has no opinion on whether rabbits 'should' chew cud; biology says 'improbable' since they're not at all set up for it; observation says no.
3/31/2012 3:15:42 PM
Nope. Yet again someone making a claim without ever checking into it. Rabbits do not have a cud system they are merely thoroughly chewing, the regularity resembles cattlebeasts action only.
Just as Her claim is only supported by fundie spokespeople who are NEVER qualified to speak on such things having spent their careers on Biblical apologism and are never academically educated in any of the sciences.
Filin De Blanc
For a second I read that as "Rabbis".
11/27/2012 12:45:00 PM
Yes, but they prefer chewing on women's extra ribs, right?
11/27/2012 2:30:01 PM
bull fucking shit
1/15/2014 2:36:50 PM
ok, so cows and rabbits are of the cud-chewing kind.
how about wombats ?
oh Bible should always be capitalized you heathen.
1/15/2014 4:18:32 PM
In what academic field are "They" active?
I'm gessing the Theology department...
Sure, and pigs are flying reptiles. And bats are birds, for that matter.
Reality was again proven wrong by the Bible.