Since atheists believe in evolution, why is the Jonah in the whale not plausible?
how are atheists sure there were no fish large enough for a man to be inside a whale without harm coming to him...is it possible for a fish like that to exist then become extinct in the grand scheme of evolution...evolution has no purpose or mind...why couldn't a large fish exist that would be able to carry a man in his stomach...or in another sack within the belly of a whale without harm...would atheists say its not evolutionarily possible and then turn around and say evolution has no purpose...besides don't atheists just say all miracles are "coincidence"...is it not coincidently possible or plausible for a different type of large fish live in the time of Noah that swallowed him and spit in on shore of his destination...if you want to say there is no evidence of a fish like that...i thought all fossils are proof of evolution...thats why we don't have transitional fossils for man...just pieces of bones while having full skeletons for dinosaurs...or does the atheists mind stop being open when it comes to religion and possibilities...showing the true closed mindedness of atheists...
fmko ( ??????????????), Yahoo! Answers 68 Comments
[1/9/2009 7:19:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 6